Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: [WEB SECURITY] Deploying WAFs In Listening-Only Mode - Waste of Money? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:35:55 -0500 |
Locking doors is also a waste of money, after all any lock can be broken. And still we all lock doors. No WAF will solve all of your web security problems but it would certainly reduce them AND make your site more protected than the next door, which might be just what you need to keep clear. A good example would be the latest SQL injection bot (WHID 2007-82, http://www.webappsec.org/projects/whid/byid_id_2007-82.shtml). So many web sites were broken into, and by just having a default install of ModSecurity (and I am sure any other WAF), they could prevent the hack. ~ Ofer --- From: Andre Gironda [mailto:andreg@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 5:32 PM To: B Snake Cc: websecurity@webappsec.org; webappsec@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] Deploying WAFs In Listening-Only Mode - Waste of Money? Deploying WAFs at all - Waste of Money? Answer: Not if you just made a check-mark on a PCI-DSS audit On 1/12/08, B Snake <bsnak3@gmail.com> wrote:
It seems like 90+% of companies that implement WAFs deploy them in listening-only mode and don't do any blocking for fear of false positives cutting off legitimate user activity. I'm new to WAFs and this may be a stupid question, but what security value does a WAF add if it's not doing any blocking of malicious activity? -BSnake
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Join us on IRC: irc.freenode.net #webappsec Have a question? Search The Web Security Mailing List Archives: http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/ Subscribe via RSS: http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss [RSS Feed] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire Methodologies & Tools for Web Application Security Assessment With the rapid rise in the number and types of security threats, web application security assessments should be considered a crucial phase in the development of any web application. What methodology should be followed? What tools can accelerate the assessment process? Download this Whitepaper today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=70170000000940F -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [WEB SECURITY] Deploying WAFs In Listening-Only Mode - Waste of Money?, Ivan Ristic |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [WEB SECURITY] Deploying WAFs In Listening-Only Mode - Waste of Money?, Ryan Barnett |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [WEB SECURITY] Deploying WAFs In Listening-Only Mode - Waste of Money?, Ofer Shezaf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [WEB SECURITY] Deploying WAFs In Listening-Only Mode - Waste of Money?, Ryan Barnett |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |