Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Universal PDF XSS Remediation (Fix) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 14 Feb 2007 07:11:42 +0100 |
Pdp, I agree, it's a client issue and to fix it entirely one has to update Acrobat.
pdp wrote: IMHO, you misunderstand the impact of this vulnerability. You are assuming that the user clicks on a pdf link which executes the malicious JavaScript. That's not always the case. I've seen various solutions to this issue and none of them work. The best thing to do is to upgrade to Reader 7.9 or 8. Even when you try to do some crazy redirection-token-magic :), it is up to the client to decide how that is going to be processed. In several simple steps the remote PDF file can be cached and recalled via <object data="http://[path to file]"></object> this also bypasses the content-disposition fix plus several other fixes.
Did you allready discribe that behavior anywhere, i'd really like to know bit more about the "several simple steps".
As I said, the best thing to do is to upgrade. Use JavaScript to check the version of the PDF plugin and if it is less then 7.9 prompt the user. This is it.
As we all know, it relies on the user whether he/she's going to definitely patch his/her software. Nonetheless, I would be interested in that JavaScript. Thanks, Cyrill ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire As web applications become increasingly complex, tremendous amounts of sensitive data - personal, medical and financial - are exchanged, and stored. Consumers expect and demand security for this information. This whitepaper examines a few vulnerability detection methods - specifically comparing and contrasting manual penetration testing with automated scanning tools. Download "Automated Scanning or Manual Penetration Testing?" today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701500000008fH6 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Universal PDF XSS Remediation (Fix), Ivan Ristic |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Universal PDF XSS Remediation (Fix), Cyrill Brunschwiler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Universal PDF XSS Remediation (Fix), Ivan Ristic |
| Next by Thread: | Interview with Chris Sullo the Author of Nikto, bugtraq |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |