Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:26:27 -0400 |
Hello:
But even when biometric authentication "works", it still does not prove my
_identity_, it just proves that I am who *I said* I am, which is another thing
entirely; and some might say is its most obvious point of failure. What's
worse, as opposed to other 2-factor authentication methods (e.g. something I
have, something I know), the "something I have" with biometrics, or as you say
the "something I am" is not easily or practically replaceable if by chance it
gets subverted. And thus, given its inherent value and importance to its owner
(I'm pretty sure we all want to keep all our fingers, eyes, etc.), the more
value placed on the payload it guards (i.e. bank account, medical records,
credit history, etc.), the higher the risk increases for its owner; as not only
can someone clean up your savings account, but they will necessarily have to
kill, maim, or otherwise molest of you in the process.
-dZ.
________________________________
From: Tim [mailto:pand0ra.usa@gmail.com]
Sent: Fri 06/30/2006 11:45
To: Andrew van der Stock
Cc: Webappsec Mail List
Subject: Re: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web
What I was trying to say is that you can only authenticate someone
through biometrics because it is something that they are. I do not
dispute that technology can be subverted or that people can be
manipulated. What I am trying to say is that a label (name, ssn)
cannot be trusted, especially nowadays. I feel the same in that
regristration would have to be done in person but again that is
impractical. Again, I am not saying that the current biometrics
technology is an adequate solution. Just that the concept of
biometrics is the only way to validate someone's identity.
You seem to be very familiar with biometrics, can you provide some
examples of products that you have experience with that you would
consider to be a scam and what ones (regardless of expense) are
adequate?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: Watchfire
As web applications become increasingly complex, tremendous amounts of
sensitive data - personal, medical and financial - are exchanged, and
stored. Consumers expect and demand security for this information. This
whitepaper examines a few vulnerability detection methods - specifically
comparing and contrasting manual penetration testing with automated
scanning tools. Download "Automated Scanning or Manual Penetration
Testing?" today!
https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701500000008Vmm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Previous by Date: | Fwd: SF new column announcement: MySpace, a place without MyParents, Andrew van der Stock |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Webscarab how to?, mr . nasty |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web, Tim |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web, Tim |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |