Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Web-App-Sec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web

Subject: Re: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:46:41 +1000

On 30/06/2006, at 4:03 PM, Tim wrote:

 the only way I see that you can accurately validate
someone would be through biometrics (something you are)

This is not possible, as:

All devices in general are tamperable and not trustworthy when in the hands of the attacker

Biometric devices have a long history of being little more than snake oil or toys. The good ones are significantly more expensive than ANY other form of actual 2FA authentication device

Many attacks against existing biometric devices are so trivial as to be a complete joke. Check out this page:

http://www.heise.de/ct/english/02/11/114/

Lastly, trustworthy biometric registration requires an in-person visit, thus negating any possibility of remote authentication.

No matter what 2FA device you use, evidence of identity is only as strong as the registration process. I'd prefer to see the initial registration (and recovery of registration) done only in-person. Otherwise the process is open to abuse by definition.

thanks,
Andrew

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>