Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:39:26 +0300 |
Wouldnât biometrics be intercept-able as data transmission packets and faked when used over a civilian network? -----Original Message----- From: Tim [mailto:pand0ra.usa@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 30 June 2006 9:04 AM To: Nick Owen Cc: Harper. Matthew; RSD; webappsec@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web I don't see the credit bureau's jumping on that wagon. Currently there is no risk to them and they are making money hand-over-fist because of ID theft. Since there is no risk why would they shell out tons of money to come up with a solution for someone elses problem? I do agree that the initial validation of someones identity is problematic. The document here is talking about authentication, which is related to the initial validation and trying to initially validate every user through a definite means is impractical. Since names and social security numbers and other similar concepts are labels that we apply to ourselves the only way I see that you can accurately validate someone would be through biometrics (something you are) . Granted there can be issues with replay attacks but it could be used for initial identification. There is no way you can really validate someones identity without them being there in person (start the flame war). Sure, you can lie when you go in but the risk of being caught is much higher. I see one of the problems being that a financial institution has to find a balance that is cost effective and can reasonably validate someones identity remotely. Sorry about some of the fragmented sentences, but I have ahd enough fun for one day.
Seems to me that transaction analysis would be tough to do on a credit application. Where is the history? (I assume your company only does online credit apps.) Any 2FA system might also be problematic: how do you do the initial validation & credentialing? If you can do the initial validation securely, why not use that as the risk mitigation method? Seems to me this is a good opportunity for a credit bureau to partner with an authentication vendor to offer initial validation/credentialing and 2FA. nick -- Nick Owen WiKID Systems, Inc. 404.962.8983 http://www.wikidsystems.com Commercial/Open Source Two-Factor Authentication https://www.linkedin.com/in/nickowen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire As web applications become increasingly complex, tremendous amounts of sensitive data - personal, medical and financial - are exchanged, and stored. Consumers expect and demand security for this information. This whitepaper examines a few vulnerability detection methods - specifically comparing and contrasting manual penetration testing with automated scanning tools. Download "Automated Scanning or Manual Penetration Testing?" today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000008BOQ --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire As web applications become increasingly complex, tremendous amounts of sensitive data - personal, medical and financial - are exchanged, and stored. Consumers expect and demand security for this information. This whitepaper examines a few vulnerability detection methods - specifically comparing and contrasting manual penetration testing with automated scanning tools. Download "Automated Scanning or Manual Penetration Testing?" today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701500000008Vmm -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire As web applications become increasingly complex, tremendous amounts of sensitive data - personal, medical and financial - are exchanged, and stored. Consumers expect and demand security for this information. This whitepaper examines a few vulnerability detection methods - specifically comparing and contrasting manual penetration testing with automated scanning tools. Download "Automated Scanning or Manual Penetration Testing?" today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701500000008Vmm --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Previous by Date: | Re: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web, Tim |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web, Andrew van der Stock |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web, Tim |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web, Andrew van der Stock |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |