Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Two-Factor Authentication on the Web |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:31:08 +0000 |
My company does online loan applications. Various agencies and customers have demanded we comply with FFIEC guidelines[0] regarding two-factor authentication. Now the guidance describes many different types of factors that could be used, such as Tokens/Biometric/Out-of-Band/etc. Now the specs I've received from our analysts indicate they have chosen the 'shared secret' as a second factor. It's a secret question like 'What is your favorite food?' that is supposed to augment the existing username and password. Here's the problem -- a password is also one considered a shared secret -- so this isn't really two-factor, more like 2 one-factors. Since the factors have identical characteristics, if one is compromised, the other will surely follow. Now the guidance doesn't see that as a problem: "The use of multiple shared secrets also provides increased security because more than one secret must be known to authenticate." Seems to me if an attacker found a password written on a post-it note, they'd find "cookies" as well. Now I can see why this route was chosen -- most of the other factors require some hardware -- and distributing any sort of physical device is not an option. My questions: -Is my analysis correct? -Are multiple shared secrets any more secure? -What viable solutions are there? Thanks! [0] http://www.ffiec.gov/pdf/authentication_guidance.pdf -- rsd@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire As web applications become increasingly complex, tremendous amounts of sensitive data - personal, medical and financial - are exchanged, and stored. Consumers expect and demand security for this information. This whitepaper examines a few vulnerability detection methods - specifically comparing and contrasting manual penetration testing with automated scanning tools. Download "Automated Scanning or Manual Penetration Testing?" today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000008BOQ --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Security Breaches Pandemic - Deloitte Touche 2006 Global Security Survey, Saqib Ali |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web, Peter Morgan |
| Previous by Thread: | Security Breaches Pandemic - Deloitte Touche 2006 Global Security Survey, Saqib Ali |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Two-Factor Authentication on the Web, Peter Morgan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |