Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Re: yahoo mail login security |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 5 May 2006 07:50:29 -0400 |
I've had my gmail account since September 2004. I've almost always logged in using https: connection, and it has been my experience that secure connection is maintained even after login and throught the session. The only time I remember logging in on non-secure connection was when they introduced the chat feature, which required (for a period of time) that I use the non-secure connection. Thanks, /prakash On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:34:53PM -0400, Darren Bounds wrote:
That Google SSL functionality must have just recently been implemented. Back in December (when I last checked) they were operating in the same fashion as Yahoo, redirecting clear text after SSL-based authentication. On 5/2/06, Damon Leung <bcdnet@myrealbox.com> wrote:In Gmail, if you start with the url https://mail.google.com, then you stay in https even after authentication. -----Original Message----- From: Ace123 <flace9@gmail.com> To: "ROB DIXON" <rdixon@workforcewv.org> Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:30:32 +0530 Subject: Re: yahoo mail login security 1. Would it then be wise to send the md5 hash over ssl? 2. Yahoo is not alone in switching to http for email after authenticating the user, both hotmail and gmail do the same. One reason I can think of why they do this is, the various resources in their pages come from different domains (possibly 3rd party) and they can't ask for all of them to do SSL. Do you know of any other reasons? 3. The cookie names these guys use are very tricky, there are usually many cookies and it is not clear why of them represents the session, so that we can take that cookie, set it in our browser and check out other's email. Ofcourse, it might be possible to set all the cookies that we see there, but I have not tried that. Has anyone done any research on what each of the cookies is used for, in yahoo/hotmail/gmail? Thanks! On 5/2/06, ROB DIXON <rdixon@workforcewv.org> wrote:exactly Robert L. Dixon, CHFI State of West Virginia's West Virginia Office of Technology Infrastructure Applications Netware/GroupWise Administrator Telephone: (304)-558-5472 ex.4225 ------------------------------------------ If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked. What's more, you deserve to be hacked. -- former White House cybersecurity czar Richard Clarke"Matt Fisher" <mfisher@spidynamics.com> >>>Don't they revert back to HTTP after auth anyhow ? Protect my credentials all you want, but if you give up my email on the wire(less) I'm switching regardless. -----Original Message----- From: ROB DIXON [mailto:rdixon@workforcewv.org] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 3:51 PM To: flace9@gmail.com; vanderaj@greebo.net Cc: webappsec@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: yahoo mail login security If you are capturing the form submission via MITM then would SSL not be just as trivial via Cain and Able.\ Granted it would be obvious since the SSL cert would appear to be invalid, but not everyone is that savy. Robert L. Dixon, CHFI State of West Virginia's West Virginia Office of Technology Infrastructure Applications Netware/GroupWise Administrator Telephone: (304)-558-5472 ex.4225 ------------------------------------------ If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked. What's more, you deserve to be hacked. -- former White House cybersecurity czar Richard ClarkeAndrew van der Stock <vanderaj@greebo.net> >>>Several reasons: 1. MD5 does protect the password... as long as it is salted correctly. Unsalted MD5 hashes are trivially breakable using rainbow attacks, and are unsuitable for most uses (despite heavy usage by many programs in exactly this fashion). 2. Replay attacks on public networks. Capturing the form submission (trivial without SSL) would allow an attacker to replay the conversation and log on as the identity without any issues 3. MD5 is provably weak as a hash - see the work of Wang et al: http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/199.pdf 4. Javascript on the client is not a trusted environment. Minimizing the trust of security weak components is a good design goal. 5. SSL is cheap. A certificate costs less than $100 these days and solves many of these issues. Andrew On 30/04/2006, at 5:55 PM, Ace123 wrote:Clicking on "Why this is secure" link on the yahoo login page gives this: "Yahoo! now submits your ID and password securely via SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) encryption. This means that your personal information is more secure every time you sign in. In the past, Yahoo! used a challenge-response mechanism to protect passwords using MD5. Passwords were scrambled using a one-way hash, so that they could not be converted to clear text." What could be the reasons why yahoo changed their login security mechanism? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire Watchfire's AppScan is the industry's first and leading web application security testing suite, and the only solution to provide comprehensive remediation tasks at every level of the application. Change the way you think about application security testing - See for yourself. Download a Free Trial of AppScan 6.0 today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/appscansix.aspx? id=701300000007kaF -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Sponsored by: Watchfire The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks Hackers continue to add billions to the cost of doing business online despite security executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This whitepaper identifies the most common methods of attacks that we have seen, and outlines a guideline for developing secure web applications. Download this whitepaper today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9r ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks Hackers continue to add billions to the cost of doing business online despite security executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This whitepaper identifies the most common methods of attacks that we have seen, and outlines a guideline for developing secure web applications. Download this whitepaper today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9r -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks Hackers continue to add billions to the cost of doing business online despite security executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This whitepaper identifies the most common methods of attacks that we have seen, and outlines a guideline for developing secure web applications. Download this whitepaper today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9r ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you, Darren Bounds ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks Hackers continue to add billions to the cost of doing business online despite security executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This whitepaper identifies the most common methods of attacks that we have seen, and outlines a guideline for developing secure web applications. Download this whitepaper today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9r --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- |Faster, faster, you fool, you fool! | | -- Bill Cosby | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks Hackers continue to add billions to the cost of doing business online despite security executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This whitepaper identifies the most common methods of attacks that we have seen, and outlines a guideline for developing secure web applications. Download this whitepaper today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9r --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Fwd: SF new column announcement: Innovative ways to fool people, Andrew van der Stock |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Round-up: Ways to bypass HttpOnly (and HTTP Basic auth), Amit Klein (AKsecurity) |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: yahoo mail login security, Darren Bounds |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: yahoo mail login security, Darren Bounds |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |