Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Comparison report on web app security scanners |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 5 May 2006 11:12:31 +0200 |
As I had mentioned in another posting to this list some time ago, a few months ago I completed a fairly extensive review of various tools: AppScan, WebInspect, Acunetix, (note AppScan and WebInspect have produced new versions since then), Burp, WebScarab, Spike Proxy, and some minor remarks on a few other tools. I used two applications as benchmarks: WebGoat and a proprietary application in production use. The report totals to about 170 pages. A number of people have expressed their interest in this report. Today I have finally attained a publication permit. You can download the report at http://fhgonline.fraunhofer.de/server?suche-publica&num=048.06/D&iese (that page will give the abstract and bibliographic information; click on the red link named "Volltext" to get at the actual PDF). However, note that the report is in German. I regret that I do not have the time to translate it, but anyone is invited to volunteer (and some people already have). If you want to help in translating, drop me a line (this applies even to those who already did, just to give me an updated picture); I will collect all volunteer addresses and distribute them next week, and from then on, you'll be on your own. Kind regards, Holger Peine -- Dr. Holger Peine, Security and Safety Fraunhofer IESE, Fraunhofer-Platz 1, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany Phone +49-631-6800-2134, Fax -1299 (shared) PGP key via http://pgp.mit.edu ; fingerprint is 1BFA 30CB E3ED BA99 E7AE 2BBB C126 A592 48EA F9F8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks Hackers continue to add billions to the cost of doing business online despite security executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This whitepaper identifies the most common methods of attacks that we have seen, and outlines a guideline for developing secure web applications. Download this whitepaper today! https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9r --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ual Factor/Adaptive Authentication, Saqib Ali |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Fwd: SF new column announcement: Innovative ways to fool people, Andrew van der Stock |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [WEB SECURITY] Re: [Owasp-dotnet] Review of Owasp-London Chapter meeting on WAF (Web Application Firewalls), Patrick Wolf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Comparison report on web app security scanners, Bogdan Calin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |