Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: cookies a fundamental threat? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:05:42 -0800 |
Cookies are not a threat to 'todays web applications'.
It is how they are implemented, and what the function of what they are implemented by is (e.g. online banking), and what it has (e.g. forums).
If I steal your cookies via the forums (assuming PATH is / and they are both on X.com), I have your bank account. Naturally, it doesn't work that way - just an example.
You must properly sanatise input, that's all. Cookies are in no way insecure.
On 4/29/06, Achim Hoffmann <kirke11@securenet.de> wrote: > Well, my post is a bit off-topic to the initial subject, but the question > and my other question "sequence of cookies in a request" show again that > cookies are a fundametal threat in todays web applications. > I claim too "There is no path security". > (cookie2 with encrypted values are a different story, however ...)
I just went and looked up your old note in the archives (http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/archive/2005-11/msg00097.html). I didn't see any responses there. One important thing about the order in which cookies are sent (that you didn't mention in your original note) is that they are sent with the most restrictive path first. For example, if there are two cookies with the same name, one with a path of /one, and the other with a path of /one/two, the /one/two cookie is sent before the /one cookie.
I'm not entirely in agreement with your statement, "cookies are a fundamental threat in todays web applications." There is simply not a viable replacement for the functionality they provide. When misguided folks suggest that a web application not use cookies for security reasons, web developers just turn around and use hidden form fields. Hidden form fields and cookies are exactly the same from a security perspective. It's just one is more difficult to implement.
If a developer is going to spend time worrying about cookies, I'd rather they worried about something useful like whether they are using a proper random number generator for their session IDs.
I'm just not seeing the fundamental threat from cookies that you describe. Would you explain a little more fully what you mean?
Regards, Brian
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire
Watchfire's AppScan is the industry's first and leading web application security testing suite, and the only solution to provide comprehensive remediation tasks at every level of the application. Change the way you think about application security testing - See for yourself. Download a Free Trial of AppScan 6.0 today!
https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/appscansix.aspx?id=701300000007kaF --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: Watchfire
https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/appscansix.aspx?id=701300000007kaF --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [WEB SECURITY] cookies a fundamental threat?, Achim Hoffmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | yahoo mail login security, Ace123 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [WEB SECURITY] cookies a fundamental threat?, Achim Hoffmann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [WEB SECURITY] Re: cookies a fundamental threat (or risk)?, Pilon Mntry |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |