Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:30:43 +1100 |
No you dont.
Arrays are all bounds checked; ..., that is, the following code will
throw an exception:
================================
class Foo {
static {
int[] m = new int[2];
System.out.println(m[34]);
}
}
================================
What do you mean by "overflow"? Do you mean this?
================================
class Foo {
static {
int m = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
int k = Integer.MAX_VALUE + Integer.MAX_VALUE;
System.out.println(m);
System.out.println(k);
System.exit(0);
}
}
================================
if so, I don't see how that is an issue.
-- Michael
On 3/29/06, Andrew van der Stock <vanderaj@greebo.net> wrote:
This is not quite true. Java does not prevent integer overflows (it will not throw an exception). So you still have to be careful about array indexes. Andrew On 29/03/2006, at 12:49 PM, michaelslists@gmail.com wrote:no, a browser written in java would not have buffer overflow/stack issues. the jvm is specifically designed to prevent it ... -- Michael
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| Previous by Date: | Re: [WEB SECURITY] SSL does not = a secure website, michaelslists |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability,Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile,and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code, Andrew van der Stock |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code, Andrew van der Stock |
| Next by Thread: | Java integer overflows (was: a really long topic), Andrew van der Stock |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |