Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:55:40 -0500 |
Serg, As you are aware there is a never ending discussion about which scanner is the best scanner for Application Scanning. Many times a persons opinion can be tainted because they work for a VAR and the product is a partner of theirs, the company published something saying they are the best to some magazine OR numerous other reasons. Each scanner has its sweet spot for detecting certain vulnerabilities. In order to show Due Diligence, What you need to do is collect the Top 10 types of applications (Java, .NET, ASP, PHP, Perl, ColdFusion) that you test the most. Contact the six vendors below, then have a Bake Off between the 6 commercial tools. NTOBJECTives NTOSpider 2.3, SPIDynamics WebInspect 5.8, WatchFire AppScan 6, Cenzic Hailstorm 3.0, WhiteHat Sentinel, Accuntix 3.0 One thing you need to remember, an Application Scanner by itself will at best discover 30% of the vulnerabilities. The other 70% are logical hacks. ****DO NOT JUST TEST AGAINST THE VENDOR TEST SITE**** ****DO NOT JUST TEST WIZARD/AUTOMATION MODE THEY ARE NOT COMPLETE**** The areas you may find interesting and use as differentiators are: *Number of False Positive Errors found *Number of Positive False Errors found *How the scanner handles authentication *How well the scanner compensates for Error Handling *Does the report provide an accurate enough fix to hand off to a developer *Is the information in the fix report correct (You will see a lot of problems with fix reports involving TomCat and many others) ***My favorite one was that NO Scanner found a Select Statement in a Hidden Field. Can it be any more BASIC? At the end of the month I am releasing a paper on my findings of the scanners. The scanners benchmarked each scanner against 37 Applications (Java, .NET, ASP, PHP, ColdFusion). It outlined the pros and cons of each scanner, unique features of each scanner. The paper is not designed to BASH Scanners and say "They Suck", but show the errors in scanners and how to over come some of them, and many of the errors the people using the scanners make. Those of you that are attending the NY Metro Infragard Meeting in NYC Sponsored by Cisco, will see key elements of the paper before it's published. The rest of you will have to wait and see it when I publish the site on ApplicationScanner.net Best of Luck, Tom Ryan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This List Sponsored by: SpiDynamics ALERT: "How A Hacker Launches A Web Application Attack!" Step-by-Step - SPI Dynamics White Paper Learn how to defend against Web Application Attacks with real-world examples of recent hacking methods such as: SQL Injection, Cross Site Scripting and Parameter Manipulation https://download.spidynamics.com/1/ad/web.asp?Campaign_ID=701300000003gRl --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RE: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan), mr . dan . friedman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: RE: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan), Gavin, Michael |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: FW: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan), arian.evans |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RE: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan), mr . dan . friedman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |