Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: FW: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:43:58 +0100 |
Nobody played with HailStorm from Cenzic yet?
From my personal experience: it looks great and has a good performance
to scan web apps. It allows to automate certain things like boundary testing, privilege escalation or bypass authorization. Because I do a lot of manual security testing with open-source tools, I don't like tools that only scan things by fuzzing parameters and show a lot of false positives. If I can't see how attacks are executed and I can't customize the attack patterns it has no usage for me. All depends on what you are looking for: low hanging fruit or an assessment tool that can be used and shared in the development phase by developers nd testers. I hope that the project at Owasp about the web app scan market (is it a project or an individual initiative?) is able to shed some light on the real power of commercial tools. I can imagine that when you need automated assessment tools and only can rely on Google or banners on security sites (or even mailing list adds :)) to learn about these products, you don't know what to choose. Erwin -----Original Message----- From: Peter Wood [mailto:peterw@firstbase.co.uk] Sent: vrijdag 17 februari 2006 16:06 To: webappsec@securityfocus.com Cc: Charles' Subject: Re: FW: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan) We use WebInspect on a daily basis too, and have done so since version 1.0. It's an excellent tool with some excellent (and constantly improving) utilities. Pete At 13:46 17/02/2006 +0000, Xyberpix wrote:
I use WebInspect pretty much ona daily basis, and wouldn't trade it for anything. As far as tools go, it really is a worthwhile addition. xyberpix-----Original Message----- From: Burke, Charles Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 7:47 AM To: 'Serg Belokamen' Subject: RE: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan) >> Also, WebInspect is a very good (commercial) tool. It also includes some invaluable utilities (Sql Injector, etc) that are a step above their open source competitors. -----Original Message----- From: Serg Belokamen [serg.belokamen@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:04 AM To: webappsec@securityfocus.com Subject: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan) >> >> Hi All, >> >>I am currently looking at using/evaluating a tool
called AppScan (by >>watchfire.com).
So the question is in two parts and ASAP reply would be greatly appreciated. First: Without starting a flame war (hopefully) or marketing campaign
(another
hopefully) can any one tell me abut their experience with the
software, >>what you find useful about it, what not, any annoyances, missing >>functionality, etc.
Second: Can anyone recommend any simular type of software, preferably open source (although not at all essential), and describe its performance, usability and "usefulness" so to speak using AppScan as a reference point. Thanks, Serg
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Wood FBCS CITP MIEEE MIMIS CISSP Chief of Operations First Base Technologies Office: +44 (0)1273 454525 Mobile: +44 (0)7774 239915 www.fbtechies.co.uk www.white-hats.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - This List Sponsored by: SpiDynamics ALERT: "How A Hacker Launches A Web Application Attack!" Step-by-Step - SPI Dynamics White Paper Learn how to defend against Web Application Attacks with real-world examples of recent hacking methods such as: SQL Injection, Cross Site Scripting and Parameter Manipulation https://download.spidynamics.com/1/ad/web.asp?Campaign_ID=701300000003gR l ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This List Sponsored by: SpiDynamics ALERT: "How A Hacker Launches A Web Application Attack!" Step-by-Step - SPI Dynamics White Paper Learn how to defend against Web Application Attacks with real-world examples of recent hacking methods such as: SQL Injection, Cross Site Scripting and Parameter Manipulation https://download.spidynamics.com/1/ad/web.asp?Campaign_ID=701300000003gRl --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: FW: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan), Serg B. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: FW: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan), Joe White |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: FW: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan), Brokken, Allen P. |
| Next by Thread: | RE: (OWASP Web App Tool Project) Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan), arian.evans |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |