Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:14:20 -0600 |
Serg, I have an older list of tools here: http://www.owasp.org/docroot/owasp/misc/OWASP_DC_2005_Presentations/Track_2- Day1/AppSec2005DC-Arian_Evans_Tools-Taxonomy.ppt This info is dated. Several tools have matured, but so is the complexity of applications on the Internet. I used to say SPI had the best proxy, but it really depends on what you are testing. SPI's proxy does not provide a way to manipulate data if you have serialized data passing client<->server in the HTTP stream (e.g.-you have something like an Eclipse rich client). A few other products have proxies that do. I'll be releasing an updated vendor list in PDF around the end of the month, and possibly a sample testing app or two. There is still enough variance between which tools do which tasks better, that the best benchmark is your own software. For a while SPI and Watchfire were the clear leaders, but now there are some other tools with strengths (and weaknesses) to consider. At the end of the day it all relies on what *you* need to do. There does not yet exist a sample application and methodology in the public domain for performing useful synthetic benchmarks. (I hope SiteGenerator will change this soon.)
software, what you find useful about it, what not, any annoyances, missing functionality, etc.
On sites with complex javascript menus with lots of links and URL parameters, I have observed AppScan to hang or go into loops when turned lose in completely automated fashion. That said, overall it is still one of the best tools in the automated scanning domain.
Second: Can anyone recommend any simular type of software, preferably open source (although not at all essential), and describe its performance, usability and "usefulness" so to speak using AppScan as a reference
Here's a list of tools I would consider evaluating: Acunetix Enterprise WVS 3.0 Cenzic Hailstorm 3.0 NT Objectives NTOSpider 2.1 Syhunt Sandcat Suite SPI Dynamics WebInspect 5.8 Watchfire Appscan 6 Manual testing tools: Burp Suite 1.01 Ecyware BlueGreen Inspector Paros Proxy OWASP Webscarab -ae ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This List Sponsored by: SpiDynamics ALERT: "How A Hacker Launches A Web Application Attack!" Step-by-Step - SPI Dynamics White Paper Learn how to defend against Web Application Attacks with real-world examples of recent hacking methods such as: SQL Injection, Cross Site Scripting and Parameter Manipulation https://download.spidynamics.com/1/ad/web.asp?Campaign_ID=701300000003gRl --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan), Rui Pereira (WCG) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Fortify Source Code Auditing Suite and the like, spammailme |
| Previous by Thread: | Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan), Serg Belokamen |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Tools comparison and evaluation question (AppScan), Peine,Holger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |