Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: PCI DSS Compliance |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:33:30 +1100 |
If you read the PCI scanning requirements, any IPS/IDP solution MUST be disabled at least for the IP address conducting the vulnerability scan, for the duration of the test. See the documentation on scanning on sdp.mastercardintl.com, page 2-2 of "Security Scanning Requirements for Vendors." However, if it's a firewall that's actively blocking/locking out the port scanning IP, then maybe the port scan can be conducted slower to get under the threshold, or a firewall rule adjustment performed for the duration of the test period. PCI requires a accurate vulnerability scan. Any PCI accredited scanner provider would imho, be within their obligated rights to not issue a 'compliant' report in the event they can't perform a meaningful vulnerability test. Ultimately, I think its up to your client, the scanning company and youur firm to negotiate a way for a meaningful vulnerability scan to be conducted. Of course, it may be that the message they provided is boilerplate, and not accurately reporting the situation they see. My 2cents Lyal -----Original Message----- From: Ademar Gonzalez [mailto:ademar.gonzalez@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2005 3:37 AM To: webappsec@securityfocus.com Subject: PCI DSS Compliance A shared hosting client needs to get his site PCI DSS certified. He forwarded us the following request from the company doing the assessment. "Your site could not be certified. Your site appears to be running scan detection software, that has prevented a reliable port scan. This test is inconclusive. Please add our scanner ip: ##.##.##.## to your scan detection software exclusion list to allow our scanner to make a complete assessment of your system." Is this request plain stupid or what ? Comments ? I have deal with this kind of requests in the past and most of the time the people running this automated scans knows nothing at all about security nor anything else and it becomes a pain dealing with the client on one end that wants his website certified and the other guy on the security company that wants you to open your firewall so hi can run his nmap or whatever it is they run. It looks like the client runs the risk of not being certified 'cause his website is over-protected. How would you proceed in this situation ? ciao ciao ademar
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: PCI DSS Compliance, Michael Johnson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: PCI DSS Compliance, Craig Wright |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PCI DSS Compliance, Pete Herzog |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PCI DSS Compliance, Peter Watkins |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |