When teaching college students we put up a few bullets in advance that
basically says
The purpose of this class is to make the student a better developer.
Use of the exploits against systems or applications without explicit
permission of the owners is a violation of our Acceptable Use policy,
and may be subject to legal action in jurisdictions worldwide.
That may not be legally formal enough to stand up in court, however it
explicitly states my intent as a teacher. It also warns the students
that they my be subject to either University discipline, or legal
action. I don't make a big deal about this, but it's there.
---
Allen Brokken
IAT Services - ISAM
University of Missouri
brokkena@missouri.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: Lyal Collins [mailto:lyal.collins@key2it.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 1:37 AM
To: 'James Strassburg'; webappsec@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Security training of developers and company liability
Obligatory IANAL disclaimer.
Is this like asking if a driving instuctor is liable because a former
student commits manslaughter or murder with a
vehicle?
I think the key issues are ethics, and intent.
With skills that are more potentially dangerous, ethics and
responsbility
needs to be part of the skills and knoweldge shared during training.
As long as the company's intent is not to attack other sites, and has
clear
policies against such activities 'on company time' then there should be
little issue. What an individual does outside of the workplace comes
down to
intent and responsibility.
TO be real safe, ask your legal team your question, along with thoughts
like
the above as background.
Your jurisidiction may be different, of course.
Lyal
-----Original Message-----
From: James Strassburg [mailto:JStrassburg@directs.com]
Sent: Thursday, 8 December 2005 3:51 AM
To: webappsec@securityfocus.com
Subject: Security training of developers and company liability
I am currently training all of my organization's software developers on
web
application security. I'm using WebScarab and WebGoat as my primary
teaching tools as I feel that seeing how the problems are exploited is
much
more effective than trying to cover every type of coding mistake that
can
lead to the problems. My question is about company liability. What if
one
of the developers used the information learned to attack another site?
Is
my company liable for their actions as we taught them how to do it?
Should
I have our legal department create a disclaimer or waiver for them to
sign?
I will be asking the same questions directly to our legal department but
thought a discussion here could provide some more insight and be
valuable
for others. thanks.
James A. Strassburg Jr.
Software Security Architect
Direct Supply, Inc.
