Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: XSS? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:14:54 -0500 |
[ Bit late, way behind on mail ] The standard thing I've seen done, particularly on .gov's is to have a "redirection message" that says "You are now being redirected to ..... Please note that this site is not affiliated with xyz. You will be redirected in 3 seconds". Seems that would fix the issue of people confusing the final site as being google. I don't consider this a vuln either, and not even much of a phishing 'enabler'. Google doesn't frame the site, they 302 to it. You can only hold hands for so long ... at some point people have to realize the url has completely changed and they're not on google
-----Original Message----- From: Serg Belokamen [mailto:serg.belokamen@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 10:32 PM To: Aman Raheja Cc: webappsec@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: XSS? URL will change which would make it obvious. Then again some will buy into it so yeah... I am kind of on a fence with this one. You did sway my opinion though; hence on the fence. I used to be on the other side :) Don't think Google can do much about though and keep same functionality. Serg On 17/11/05, Aman Raheja <araheja@techquotes.com> wrote:Why would it not be a problem if someone sends an emailwith the linkhttp://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.xyz.com and promptuser to signup for some new google service or even sign in to personalize the google homepage? The user will get redirected to the xyz site which wouldshow googlelogo and same look and feel and collect the userinformation - whichcould potentially be misused. They are probably not going away the credit card or bank information but it is phishing andcollecting userinformation by misleading. AR Serg B. wrote:I really dont see a problem here? Vulnerability? What are you on about? Simple, expectedredirect (keyword: expected). Here is a more in context example. Lets say you have some sort of managment system (lets say a CRM of some sort) and you search for user with name 'A'. Returned result set contains 20 matches. You are presented with a list and you choose which one you want to look at in details. However if result set returned is a single, exact match then there is absolutelyno pointshowing a list of matches since we already know that thereis only asingle match. Hence, go directly to data, saving time and effort. Serg On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 13:51 +0000, Aman Raheja wrote:This is not XSS but indeed a vulnerability since they are not validating the URL and it's irresponsible of google notto take careof this kind of vulnerability which would aid phishing. Aman Raheja http://www.techquotes.com On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:52:19 +0800, Andrew Chan<quickt@gmail.com> wrote :I triedhttp://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.microsoft.com and itgot directed. it seems that I received one such phishingemail thatmakes use of this to obfuscate the actual URL lately.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: ODBC Injection, Lepore, Brian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: ODBC Injection, Brett Moore |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XSS?, Pilon Mntry |
| Next by Thread: | Blind SQL Injection / Stored procedures, Andres Molinetti |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |