Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Combatting automated download of dynamic websites? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:18:00 +0200 |
Which preventive or repressive measures could one apply to protect larger dynamic websites against automated downloading by tools such as WebCopier and Teleport Pro (or curl, for that matter)? For a website like Amazon's, I reckon some technical measures would be in place to protect against 'leakage' of all product information by such tools (assuming such measures are justified by calculated risk). The data we publish online are important company gems which we want to be accessible by any visitor, but to be protected against systematic download in either non-intentional context (like Internet Explorer's built-in MSIECrawler) or intentional context (WebCopier, Teleport, ...). Consider this: detailpage.html?bid=0000001 detailpage.html?bid=0000002 detailpage.html?bid=0000003 (...) Or with multiple levels: detailpage.html?bid=0000001&t=1 detailpage.html?bid=0000001&t=2 detailpage.html?bid=0000002&t=1 detailpage.html?bid=0000002&t=2 (...) In specific, I was wondering if it's possible and sensible to limit the allowed number of requests for certain pages per minute/hour. At the same time, the data displayed by detailpage.html should be indexable by Google, so the data itself can't be hidden behind a user login and it's not possible to use any client-side scripting as Google doesn't interpret it. I'm using Apache 2 on RedHat 4 Enterprise and know about mod_throttle (which doesn't work with Apache 2) and mod_security (which also offers some 'throttling' functionality, regression, but is only able to work with individual requests and can't remember request
sequences).
I'd also suppose that dealing with proxy servers of large ISPs, like AOL, is a big caveat. Any ideas?
bugtraq@cgisecurity.net wrote:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=apache+prevent+image+hotlinking&btnG=Google+Search http://www.alistapart.com/articles/hotlinking/ Also check out mod_throttle. http://www.snert.com/Software/mod_throttle/ - zeno http://www.cgisecurity.com
Thanks for your reply zeno! But actually, referer-based anti leeching won't do it for me and mod_throttle isn't suitable for Apache 2. I'm in need of a throttling function based on something more advanced like a 'request history stack' to check the order in which pages were requested, probably within a certain time period, et cetera. Maybe it'd be better to move such security measures into the actual web application itself, but I'm still hoping someone knows of a service-based solution (i.e. like the beforementioned Apache module). Matthijs
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Defeating CAPTCHA, wilsonc |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Combatting automated download of dynamic websites?, bugtraq |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Combatting automated download of dynamic websites?, bugtraq |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Combatting automated download of dynamic websites?, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |