Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Web-App-Sec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Entrust - Identity Guard - Any experience?

Subject: Re: Entrust - Identity Guard - Any experience?
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:38:56 -0400

Mary Ann Burns wrote:
two-factor authentication is (1) something physical (USB key) with
(2)something you know (pin) There is no such thing as 2-Factor
authentication without a physical device.
>

I would like to whole heartedly agree that 2 factor authentication *should be* something you have and something unique to the individual and something difficult to duplicate. However I've found in most situations other "security professionals" are classifying the following as 2nd-factor authentication (when combined with a password).

1. Electronic certificates, X.509, SSL client certificates, SSH keys, pgg keys whatever.
2. Software version of RSA secure-id, other software generated tokens or on-time-passwords.


My own opinion is that these are certainly better than 1 factor, but higher risk than the have it your hand 2-factor authentication. Maybe they should be called 1.5 factor! However I have generally found myself in the minority. What do people think?

-- Ralf Durkee, CISSP, GSEC, GCIH
http://rd1.net

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>