Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Web-App-Sec
[Top] [All Lists]

Administrivia: Follow up to survey responses

Subject: Administrivia: Follow up to survey responses
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:12:48 +1000
Hi there,

The overwhelming majority (13/15) of replies had no problems with mail list volume.
- Result: if we get 50 on-topic posts a day, 50 will be approved*


Of those who mentioned the SSL topic going on a holiday, all wanted the topic to continue.
- Result: I did not truncate the SSL topic


thanks for your input! If you have any concerns about this list, please feel free to contact me directly.

thanks,
Andrew

* If you do not like lots of messages or use ancient mail software (like mail or mailx) which cannot filter into folders, I strongly recommend you subscribe to our digest version. The digest version issues a single post per day I believe.

To change over, unsubscribe here:
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive

Re-subscribe by sending a blank e-mail to:
webappsec-digest-subscribe@securityfocus.com

The mail subject or body don't matter. It will return a message for you to follow. Please note that I only approve or disapprove posts - I cannot change or remove member subscriptions.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Administrivia: Follow up to survey responses, Andrew van der Stock <=