Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Should login pages be protected by SSL? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:04:51 -0400 |
I agree, but I can see why most places do not do this. 1) SSL on the server side eats up a lot of cpu time. Yes, this day and age there are proxy boxes,ssl off-load boxes, faster cpu's..ect, But not everybody has the money or time to upgrade. When you get thousands or millions of hits, it can make a difference. 2) Most login functions are more then just a form based login. It may look like your about to enter your info in cleartext, but a correct Page will encrypt the info and pass you to a ssl page. There are a lot of other items besides ssl that can hurt you. One quick example - cookies. A poor program could store info in the clear in a cookie and even leave it on your hard disk. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Dave Ockwell-Jenner [mailto:doj@solar-nexus.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 07:05 AM Cc: webappsec@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Should login pages be protected by SSL? From a purely non-technical viewpoint: it may be a good idea for the login page to be protected by SSL if for no other reason that having the browser show the "padlock" symbol. It's something that non-technical, non-web developer people can see and (somewhat) understand. Since they are typing their password on a page, that's what many associate with - "I'm not entering my password here, I don't see the padlock". Amir Herzberg wrote:
There may be some argument even in this case (privacy, tendency of users to use same passwords, ...). But this was _not_ my intent. I may
not have been clear, but I am interested in sensitive sites - financial, shopping, security (CA, DNS, SSO, Portals, etc.). As you can see in my `Hall of Shame` http://AmirHerzberg.com/shame.html, many
of these don't use SSL to authenticate the login page, only to encrypt
the password (when using a correct login page). So, the real question I'm asking: should login pages to sensitive (e.g. financial) sites be protected by SSL?
-- Dave Ockwell-Jenner Solar Nexus Solutions http://www.solar-nexus.com/ ----------------------------------------- This e-mail message is private and may contain confidential or privileged information.
| Previous by Date: | Re: Should login pages be protected by SSL?, Bob Radvanovsky |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Should login pages be protected by SSL?, James Barkley |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Should login pages be protected by SSL?, Eoin Keary |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Should login pages be protected by SSL?, Flanagan, Kevin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |