Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: webapp dependencies |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:00:33 -0700 |
Still the strace method with spidering is pretty good.
On Apr 20, 2005, at 12:36 PM, Scovetta, Michael V wrote:
I agree, this is a cool idea-- just one caveat-- you can't guarantee that your get 100% coverage (What if you have an admin section, and someone only goes there once a year?) You could probably combine this approach with a web-spidering application, and then manually go through and see about special pages, or password protected sections.
Michael Scovetta Computer Associates Senior Application Developer
-----Original Message----- From: Matt Fisher [mailto:mfisher@spidynamics.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 2:13 AM To: Amit Klein (AKsecurity); Ory Segal; Jarmon, Don R; webappsec@securityfocus.com Cc: wasc-technical@webappsec.org Subject: RE: webapp dependencies
That's not a bad idea. Capturing at a lower level would indeed give
more details. I don't think I've ever used strace. Would the output be
relatively clean ? Ie, not too much work to filter the wheat from the
chaffe ?
-----Original Message----- From: Amit Klein (AKsecurity) [mailto:aksecurity@hotpop.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 2:27 AM To: Ory Segal; Jarmon, Don R; webappsec@securityfocus.com; Matt Fisher Cc: wasc-technical@webappsec.org Subject: RE: webapp dependencies
On 19 Apr 2005 at 23:21, Matt Fisher wrote:
finds a good
I'd really be interested in hearing about it if anyonetool / technique but at this point I really don't see howit could besufficiently performed from any client sided product suchas crawlers,scanners, accessibility testers etc.
I'd take quite a different approach. At runtim, attach to the web process at a low level (kernel?), e.g. strace, and log access to files. Then use a crawler to enumerate (to the extent possible) all flows through the app. This should give you the list of files accessed by the web server process (there are many detailed to be ironed out, such as server caching, spawning new proceses, etc. but I believe it's doable).
In the above example, once you make a hit on the page.asp, strace would first show the web process to read page.asp, and immediately thereafter page1.html.
-Amit
--- Bill Pennington, CISSP, CCNA VP Services WhiteHat Security Inc. http://www.whitehatsec.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: suggesting passwds to users, SecurityFocus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Java keystore password storage, john bart |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: webapp dependencies, Scovetta, Michael V |
| Next by Thread: | suggesting passwds to users, James Barkley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |