Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Preventing direct URL access in a J2EE environment |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:35:18 -0500 |
Yes, I have done it this way before. You don't even need to put them in the WEB-INF directory. You can have the servlet read the file itself and stream it back. Just configure the JSP container to send requests for the resource to the servlet. You do need some mechanism for the servlet to determine a valid request from an invalid one - e.g. session information. It's nice because it does not impact the existing app. -David -----Original Message----- From: Dwayne Ghant [mailto:dghant@temple.edu] Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 4:28 PM To: Kevin Conaway Cc: webappsec@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Preventing direct URL access in a J2EE environment I believe you can drop the whole application into the WEB-INF directory and just point to it using a servlet or index.jsp from you local web content directory. What Container are you using.?? Tomcat , BEA , WebLogic, Oracle (Tomcat), WebSphere ect. Kevin Conaway wrote:
Blocking the referrer does nothing for me in this context. A.) You should NEVER rely on input from the user do to security
validations
and B.) I cant use the referrer tag since it will show up as coming from my site when users are browsing legitimately. I just want to enforce that users actually click on a link to go to a certain page, not type in the URL manually. Thanks Kevin On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:22:52 -0800, Saqib Ali <docbook.xml@gmail.com> wrote:well for most applications that require anti-leeching, just deny any HTTP request which has the HTTP_REFERER set to blank. In Peace, Saqib Ali http://validate.sf.net On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:34:30 -0800 (PST), RSnake <rsnake@shocking.com>
wrote:
Referers are also not availible in some security settings. Zonelabs Zone Alarm Pro, and both Norton Internet Security and Norton Personal Firewall all drop the referring URL. Forget spoofable, sometimes it's just not there at all. See this for details from Symantec:
http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/nip.nsf/46f26a2d6dafb0a788256bc7005c3fa 3/b9b47ad7eddd343b88256c6b006a85a8?OpenDocument&src=bar_sch_nam
There are a number of tricks you can use to get more information from the user's machine, but Referring URL isn't reliable. Not to mention it can also be non-existant via meta refreshing. On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Saqib Ali wrote:It is a commonly used technique called anti-leeching or anti-leaching . Search for "anti leeching php" or "anti leeching jsp" on Google. You will find many resources. You can control the path that a user takes by checking for the HTTP_REFERER . But this is not a fail-proof technique, because the HTTP_REFERER can alwasy be spoofed. In Peace, Saqib Ali http://validate.sf.net On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:19:37 -0500, Kevin Conaway <kevin.conaway@gmail.com> wrote:For our application, we would like to prevent users from requesting application resources directly. E.g. browsing to http://localhost/app/method.do?id=5&type=3 instead of actually clicking on a link that the application provides. We would like to do this without a major impact on our code. I was thinking of using the following scenario: - Currently we have tag libraries that help build all our URLS. These tag libraries would be modified to include a strong cryptographic token that is unique to each URL/User combination. - The token/URL combination would be stored in the application context for a pre-determined amount of time. - Next, we would use a Servlet filter to intercept the URL. First, deny URLS requested without tokens. If a token is passed, verify that matches the token stored in the application context for the requested URL. For the token, I was considering using SecureRandom to generate a random number and compute a hash of the random number and the URI being requested. This would be stored along with with URI and the user Id. Could anyone point out any pitfalls I need to be aware of, or if I'm going about things the wrong way? Thanks Kevin-- In Peace, Saqib Ali http://tools.tldp.org/search.php <--- Search for Linux HOWTOs-R XSS Cheatsheet: http://www.shocking.com/~rsnake/xss.html The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is expressly prohibited and may be unlawful.-- In Peace, Saqib Ali http://tools.tldp.org/search.php <--- Search for Linux HOWTOs
-- Dwayne A. Ghant Application Developer Temple University 215.204.5555 dghant@temple.edu
| Previous by Date: | RE: Dropping connection instead of returning 400, christopher |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Web Scanners, Tonie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Preventing direct URL access in a J2EE environment, Dwayne Ghant |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Preventing direct URL access in a J2EE environment, Kevin Conaway |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |