Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: storing SSNs, CCNs, password in the DB |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:55:39 -0500 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Of course, the best way is not to store them. If you do have to store them for logon purposes, you should hash them. You should know, however, that the security of SHA1 has been under question lately due to a recent Chinese paper purportedly documenting the cracking of SHA1 in a relatively short amount of time. (See http://www.schneier.com/bloc/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html). If you need to store them for retrieval, your webserver should be able to send to the database, but not retrieve the information. Only a computer not on the public network should be able to retrieve the information, and access to that computer should be restricted. So you will need your database to be on a separate computer, with restricted physical & network access to that computer. - -Joseph Miller On Sunday 27 February 2005 9:08 pm, Francesco wrote:
It's for a web-based financial application (users accessing credit-card transaction information, signing in with their card number, PIN and last 4 of SSN) so we pretty much *have* to have that information in the DB to compare at logon. Francesco On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:28:20 -0500, "Adam Shostack" <adam@homeport.org> said:So, this will sound like pedantry, but it's worth starting from: The most secure way is to not store them. Use them for what you need, and then throw them away. With increasing numbers of laws coming into effect if you store these sorts of data, it may be worth business process analysis to see if you can discard data early. If you don't have an SSN, you can't decide that it would make a good password. (You also can't report on tax issues.) Adam On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 02:32:12PM -0800, Francesco wrote: | What is the most secure way to store SSNs, CCNs, and passwords in the | DB? | | Is this a good general policy? | | 1. If you need to be able to read the data back, the encrypt/decrypt | with something like TDES, storing the keys in the registry. | | 2. If you don't need to read the data back and you just need to compare, | then hash/salt with SHA1, storing the hash and salt in the DB. | | Francesco
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCIyLemXZROF+EADURApRgAJwLvEYmSjjP2ZlYVhG6zkyu7k1rmACeN+m6 jS4s86qxQX3ZEOGMvu0zmwE= =ZIFg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: storing SSNs, CCNs, password in the DB, Paul Johnston |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: What is more secure?, Harry de Grote |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: storing SSNs, CCNs, password in the DB, Paul Johnston |
| Next by Thread: | RE: storing SSNs, CCNs, password in the DB, Jeff Robertson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |