Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Smart card proposal |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:34:11 +1100 |
IMHO, the security issues of 'web sites communicating with tokens' are poorly addressed. If the site is hacker controlled (the main page site, advertising, image sources etc), then anything can happen, good or bad. While we want to good to occur, the bad is just as important to control Tokens effectively have a 'power of attorney' over one's authenticated services. Being realtively, dumb, they follow a few simple rules to generate output that commits the human to the consequences of the input. Human-mediated input/output, and indeed control over the 'power of attorney' processing is severely lacking in the products available today. No solutions appear to provide strong, ongoing control by the user of how, when and why the device is used to authenticate/encrypt transaction related content. A refocussing on products that address business and user needs is necessary. I fear that most infrastructure and products in this space is too insecure or dumb to actually do any of the necessary human mediated secure communication and authentication Lyal
-----Original Message----- From: Koh Gim Leng [mailto:kohgimleng@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 28 January 2005 2:10 PM To: Richard M. Smith Cc: webappsec@securityfocus.com; maburns@safenet-inc.com Subject: Re: Smart card proposal On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:45:52 -0500, Richard M. Smith <rms@computerbytesman.com> wrote:Hi, What seems more user-friendly to me is that a single USBkey device needs tobe sharable between 5 credit cards, rather than having 5separate devices.What I still do not understand is how a Web sitecommunicates with the USBkey device.Web site communicates to a web browser which in term communicates to a set of standard APIs known as PKCS#11. Every smart card token or USB token vendor who wants to sell their token will provide you with their PKCS#11. Being a standard, your browser will know which API to call within the PKCS#11. If the token is in the form smart card, then the PKCS#11 provided by the smart card vendor will include means to call the smart card drivers provided as well. If the token is in the form of USB, then the PKCS#11 provided by the USB vendor will inculdes means to call the USB drivers as well. Bottom line - whatever happens belows PKCS#1l should be transparent to the web browser (or any PKI enabled application). Regards Sam Koh
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Off topic: what is sensitive information on a website?, Michael Silk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: phishing pages, Paul Laudanski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Smart card proposal, Koh Gim Leng |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Smart card proposal, maburns |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |