Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: (not really a) Proposal to anti-phishing |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:08:13 -0500 |
On Jan 24, 2005, at 2:28 PM, Wall, Kevin wrote:
Mike Andrews writes...
I remember doing a quiz on phishing some time ago. After muchdigging,couldhere's a link to the quiz (version 2)
http://survey.mailfrontier.com/survey/quiztest.html
Sorry, it doesn't give any results of the survey - perhaps someoneemail the company and ask about the results, especially which onespeopledidn't get.
Of course, the "quiz" is pretty much useless. There are some obvious phishing attempts, but the few that look (are?) legitimate, one can't really tell because all they give you is an image, so you can't really see what the links are pointing to or do a 'view source', etc.
Of course, the point should be one should ALWAYS go to the the web site directly to type in the appropriate URL (if they know what it is; otherwise look up their site on a search engine and then type it in).
But IMHO, I think that HTML e-mail should be outlawed, period. That
alone
might go a long way to eliminating a lot of phishing schemes, especially
the ones that rely on bugs in the MUA's HTML rendering engine to entice
the victims.
-kevin wall
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Proposal to anti-phishing, Michael Silk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Anti-Phishing, why it doesn't work, Felix Berger |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: (not really a) Proposal to anti-phishing, Mike Andrews |
| Next by Thread: | RE: (not really a) Proposal to anti-phishing, Scovetta, Michael V |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |