Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Web-App-Sec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Content monitorting in Application Security

Subject: Re: Content monitorting in Application Security
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:34:41 -0800
Explicitly trusting the content-type header value and the file extension when they match alone is not a good idea.
Here's a process I have seen done in the past that seems to work fairly effectively.


1) Is the content-type header value a valid file-type your expecting to receive (HTML/XML/GIF)? If not, fail.
2) Does the content-type header value and file extension match with a mime-type entry? If not, fail.
3) Is the file within certain size constraints? If not, fail.
4) Does the file have proper format according to what its claiming to be? If not, fail.
5) If is an HTML file, then run it through some security filtering libraries.


* Hopefully I got the steps right. Someone might want to double check the logic flow *

With respect to the question, step 4 is where the details really matter. While you could use the unix 'file' command (as suggest by another poster) to determine actual file type, I would prefer another approach.

Use the content-type header value that the files claims to be and parse based on that premise. For instance if the file claimed to be GIF when it hits step 4, run it through an image parser and see if there are any errors. Usually when I see files uploaded via web interface, the expect type of file is fairly limited for the most part. Normally maybe a few types of text files (HTML, CSV, XML), pictures (GIF, JPG, PNG), possibly mp3's, etc. I would handle each type of file on a case-by-case basis.

I don't know exactly how the unix 'file' command works, but I believe its going to make its best guess based on certain identifiable format indicators. And if this is all your looking for, its a great util. Personally I think its better to know if a file would actually parse rather than just appears to be something it might not be.

Just preference between the different methods.


jeremiah-



On Sunday, January 9, 2005, at 01:22  PM, Ofer Shezaf wrote:


Hi Jeremiah,

I was researching lately the issue of ensuring that files (uploaded and
downloaded) are of the right type.

Do you think that matching extension and content type header would be
enough? If no, are you aware of any technology to determine a file type
according to its content?

~ Ofer

Ofer Shezaf
CTO, Breach Security

Tel: +972.9.956.0036 ext.212
Cell: +972.54.443.1119
ofers@breach.com
http://www.breach.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremiah Grossman [mailto:jeremiah@whitehatsec.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 3:44 AM
To: Alfred Hitchcock
Cc: webappsec@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Content monitorting in Application Security

Sounds like common web site functionality and the resulting security
challenge.

Here are techniques that may help...

1) When receiving an uploaded file of any kind, use various parser
libraries to sanity check the actual format of data. Ensuring the file
being uploaded is what it claims to be. With the incoming file
extension and content type header in agreement. jpeg's should be
formatted like jpegs, mp3's like mp3's, html like html and so on.

2) If you plan on handling files beyond plain text, such as zips and
exe's, you may consider using some type of A/V product as well. A nice
security add-on that can be useful depending on the situation.

3) This following method is strictly about XSS and HTML/JavaScript
content.

While its fairly easy to filter all HTML tags from a file to prevent
XSS, its exponentially harder to separate HTML from executable
client-side code (JavaScript). Especially when the HTML is freeform
and
most tags need to be supported on the web site. I've long said its a
slippery slope to support use-submitted HTML, but sometimes it can't
be
helped.

There are a few things than can do help mitigate the risk of the
uploaded files.

        a. Filter out potentially malicious HTML tags or only allows a
strict
set of safe HTML tags.
        b. Filter out potentially malicious tag attributes or only
allows a
strict set of safe tag attributes.

        * The either or is a  give and take of security vs.
functionality/ease-of-use.

Depending on the programming language you are using, there might
be
some libraries available that could help make this process easier. I
haven't used them, but I noticed there are libraries available for
Perl.

http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/dist/HTML-StripScripts http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/dist/HTML-Scrubber-StripScripts

There might be some available if you use some other language.


best of luck!


jeremiah-






On Friday, January 7, 2005, at 04:55 AM, Alfred Hitchcock wrote:

Hi All, I have a major doubt it would be of great help if anybody can
provide
solution to this.
I have a web page which allows to upload files such as jpeg and html
files.
Is there any mechanisms which can detect malicious html files. E.g.
if
a html page has got a malicious java script such as alert('xss')
then
how can we check these things. One more point to be noted here is
that
uploading of file can be done by any user.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>