Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Account Lockouts |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 9 Dec 2004 01:26:31 -0500 |
I find this very surprising. Maybe I don't understand CAPTCHA's or image processing technology well enough. I've checked around a bit and can't get a clear story on how these are done. The following is my idea of how I would do this. Does this make sense? Why is it so easy to crack? As far as I can see the problem can be broken down as follows: 1) Start with a test image of a series of alphanumeric characters 2) Use a general transformation on them. My first try would be a 2 dimensional polynomial transformation of order 3 or so. This would give us a set of real numbers (the polynomial coefficients) to play with - these are our parameters. 3) map out the parameter space so that humans have an easy time and OCR programs don't. This would be a bit of work but I expect the parameter space to be contiguous. I'm not sure this would be possible otherwise. 4) Now you have a very large set of transformations that can be randomly generated - just generate random numbers within the parameter space you have defined. 5) to generate a CAPTCHA, just generate a random series of alphanumeric characters, create an image from them, and apply a random transformation. I agree this is not perfect. There is a chance that the CAPTCHA will be too hard to read. But that can be tuned to minimize this to an acceptable level. The OCR program may also get it right once in a while. But the likelihood of getting it right along with the right password has got to be low. -DR -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Klimov [mailto:alserkli@inbox.ru] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 4:29 AM To: The Amazing Dragon Cc: Mark Burnett; webappsec@securityfocus.com; secprog@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Account Lockouts On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, The Amazing Dragon wrote:
From: Mark Burnett <mb@xato.net> There has been some talk of CAPTCHA's in this thread and I wanted to
comment
on them further. Although CAPTCHA's are very effective at blocking
automated
abuse, in their current form they are not an effective long term
strategy.
The problem is that with our current image enhancement, OCR, and AI technology, they can be cracked with quite good accuracy. Their limited
use
and proprietary implementations still makes them useful for now but once someone releases a script kiddie tool to automate CAPTCHA cracking, they will become mostly ineffective.I'm surprised that no one has implemented one yet. Though OCR programs are at least halfway there.
It is very hard to be sure that "no one has implemented one yet" :-) Quite some time ago I had an argument with my friend web-master about total insecurity of this approach and in less than one day I wrote a program to recognise numbers written on an image. The program was in no way AI: I downloaded several images and crop out all different digits, so the program simply load an image and the images of all digits and for every place in image, every digit, and every transformation calculates the difference between the image of the digit and the image (I used simple sum of squares of differences in each pixel for this). The program works less than a second (there are not so many points in image times number of digits times *sufficiently different* transformations). Most of the time I spent was to capture images and classify transformations, so I agree that using CAPTCHA makes your site more vulnerable to script-kiddies, but even implementing it youself does not protect you that much from somebody with moderate patience and programming skills. -- Regards, ASK
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PHP Easter Eggs, Rick Crelia |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Account Lockouts, Valdis . Kletnieks |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Account Lockouts, Alexander Klimov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Account Lockouts, Valdis . Kletnieks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |