Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: PHP Easter Eggs |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:49:22 -0500 |
Maybe I'm not viewing this in the right light, but if PHP is to gain momentum in the corporate world and seriously compete with the other dominate web "languages", findings like this will discredit PHP. I personally like PHP and use it as well as others, but trying to sell PHP to management with findings like this may hamper the growth and acceptance of PHP. Yes, I know there are Easter eggs in almost everything out there, especially M$oft apps. Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Jimi Thompson [mailto:jimi.thompson@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:36 PM To: Paul Fierro Cc: webappsec@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: PHP Easter Eggs I think the real concern here is that they've put these "hidden little gems" in there in the first place. Since no one else seems to want to come right out and say it, I'll do it. If that's in there, what else is in there that we just haven't found yet? A photograph of someone's dog in and of itself isn't very threatening. However, when you expect your system and and application to be fairly secure and you find something like this, you have to wonder what else is there that's also not "public". Does this mean that if I go join up on the PHP developers mailing lists/forums that I can find out about other stuff that might enable me to compromise a widely used e-commerce application like osCommerce? or nukeCommerce? or phpShop? or X-cart? or any of the other scads of both commercial and opensource e-commerce suites that are available. The only comment I have for the PHP development team is that this is _VERY_ uncool. 2 cents, Jimi On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:24:22 -0600, Paul Fierro <pablo@nothing.com> wrote:
On 11/30/2004 2:53 AM, exon <exon@home.se> wrote:The code should be removed from PHP altogether since it doesn't exactly provide much in the way of functionality. Possibly php_credits() could be added as a function, the way php_info() is now. That way nobody could glean information unawares, but the info would still be there if you need it (and it would be much easier to come by).A function named phpcredits() already exists: http://www.php.net/phpcredits Paul
-- Thanks, Jimi
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Article - A solution to phishing, Rogan Dawes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Account Lockouts, Michael Silk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SQL injection (no single quotes used), Adam Tuliper |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PHP Easter Eggs, Rick Crelia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |