Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Web-App-Sec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Account Lockouts

Subject: Re: Account Lockouts
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:22:39 +0200
Hi..

again this will come down to your particular situation.. all of saudi arabia just about comes through a single proxy.. you probably could whitelist it.. but then what? it means any attacker with a bounce box in .sa gets a get out of jail free card ?

If you are a running a banking app.. do you blacklist the company attacking you when a user somewhere behind the proxy decides to get "fiddly".. it leads to decent DoS possibilities.. secretary in fortune 500 tries 10 bad logins and suddenly the CFO (and his whole financial team) cant use the bank.app either..

i personally dont think we can make any call / take any action on the IP address when talking web-apps.. unless you are using some sort of control/applet that builds a reasonably accurate, reasonably individual fingerprint of the "user", and in that case, you are lockign out the fingerprint not the ip..

/MH


Jason Coombs wrote:
run into problems with large proxies
if you use this approach, but


Somebody should assemble a centralized list of these terrible beasts, large 
proxies.

My preference is to presume that the IP is that of an attacker first, and 
whitelist the known large proxies.

Jason Coombs
jasonc@science.org

-----Original Message-----
From: "David LeBlanc" <dleblanc@exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 20:41:09 To:"Harrison Gladden" <hgladden@gmail.com>, <webappsec@securityfocus.com>, <secprog@securityfocus.com>
Subject: RE: Account Lockouts


This depends on the asset you're trying to protect. If it is a bank,
maybe I want to force someone to call.

This would be hard to implement, but if you could also track the source
IP of the logon, you could then only allow some small number of user
names to be tried from any one IP address. Won't protect you from an
army of bots, but ought to get rid of most of the anklebiters. You may
run into problems with large proxies if you use this approach, but
again, this depends on your use scenario.

Injecting some randomization into the user names would make sense. Make
the attacker guess as much as possible.

-----Original Message-----
From: Harrison Gladden [mailto:hgladden@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 9:52 AM
To: webappsec@securityfocus.com; secprog@securityfocus.com
Subject: Account Lockouts


Hello all,

My question to the group is about handling account lock outs.  Here's
the situation, assume there is a web interface that lets users log in
and do stuff, but the log-in process is constrained by the network
restrictions as well.. Meaning if a user tries to log in X times in Y
seconds and fails each time, then the account get locked out.

What are successfull techniques that could be used on the web interface
to avoid having a script run against it that would potentially lock out
15000 user accounts, and create a headache for the system administrators
who have to manually unlock each account?

Also assume the current user account names are known by everyone.

Possible techniques we've thrown around:
1)  Allow each user to pick their own username instead of using a
standard (i.e. First 3 letters of first name + Full last name)

2) Create a set time-out period for each account of X (maybe an hour)


Hopefully my question makes sense.


Thanks,
Harrison
--
___________________________________
Harrison Gladden <hgladden@gmail.com>
Computer Engineer & Science Major
~Past experience: He who never makes mistakes, never did anything that's worth.~



-- ====================================================================== Haroon Meer MH SensePost Information Security +27 83786 6637 PGP : http://www.sensepost.com/pgp/haroon.txt haroon@sensepost.com ======================================================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>