Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Account Lockouts |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:38:59 +0000 GMT |
run into problems with large proxies if you use this approach, but
Somebody should assemble a centralized list of these terrible beasts, large proxies. My preference is to presume that the IP is that of an attacker first, and whitelist the known large proxies. Jason Coombs jasonc@science.org -----Original Message----- From: "David LeBlanc" <dleblanc@exchange.microsoft.com> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 20:41:09 To:"Harrison Gladden" <hgladden@gmail.com>, <webappsec@securityfocus.com>, <secprog@securityfocus.com> Subject: RE: Account Lockouts This depends on the asset you're trying to protect. If it is a bank, maybe I want to force someone to call. This would be hard to implement, but if you could also track the source IP of the logon, you could then only allow some small number of user names to be tried from any one IP address. Won't protect you from an army of bots, but ought to get rid of most of the anklebiters. You may run into problems with large proxies if you use this approach, but again, this depends on your use scenario. Injecting some randomization into the user names would make sense. Make the attacker guess as much as possible. -----Original Message----- From: Harrison Gladden [mailto:hgladden@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 9:52 AM To: webappsec@securityfocus.com; secprog@securityfocus.com Subject: Account Lockouts Hello all, My question to the group is about handling account lock outs. Here's the situation, assume there is a web interface that lets users log in and do stuff, but the log-in process is constrained by the network restrictions as well.. Meaning if a user tries to log in X times in Y seconds and fails each time, then the account get locked out. What are successfull techniques that could be used on the web interface to avoid having a script run against it that would potentially lock out 15000 user accounts, and create a headache for the system administrators who have to manually unlock each account? Also assume the current user account names are known by everyone. Possible techniques we've thrown around: 1) Allow each user to pick their own username instead of using a standard (i.e. First 3 letters of first name + Full last name) 2) Create a set time-out period for each account of X (maybe an hour) Hopefully my question makes sense. Thanks, Harrison -- ___________________________________ Harrison Gladden <hgladden@gmail.com> Computer Engineer & Science Major ~Past experience: He who never makes mistakes, never did anything that's worth.~
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Account Lockouts, Eric Coleman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Account Lockouts, Valdis . Kletnieks |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Account Lockouts, Eric Coleman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Account Lockouts, Haroon Meer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |