Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Web-App-Sec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: An Open Letter (and Challenge) to the Application Security Consortiu

Subject: Re: An Open Letter (and Challenge) to the Application Security Consortium
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:19:23 -0800
Fair call but isn't it also about time someone called BS on your 
members for the shiny red button marketing of app scanners?

Point them at WebGoat, WebMaven, Hacme Bank and they all fail 
miserably. (Note they all pass their in-house written canned test 
apps though). I want to see some real test results for these 
things. My results show less that 1 in 10 issues in the real world. 
Thats horrible. 

I say good for OWASP for sticking up for the masses and calling BS 
where they see it. Please make sure you cover app scanners as well!


Some people may have been under the impression that this letter was 
 
directed towards the "Web Application Security Consortium" (WASC)  
http://www.webappsec.org.  To clarify, I believe this letter was 
meant  
for ANOTHER group including F5, Imperva, NetContinuum, and Teros.  
Specifically a challenge they sent to Check Point, Cisco, Juniper,  

McAfee and Symantec. Many industry acronyms are very close.

Reference the following URL's for background.

The press release found here:
https://www.netcontinuum.com/newsroom/pressReleaseItem.cfm?uid=42

further industry coverage here:
http://news.com.com/Group+aims+to+create+hallmark+of+security/2100- 

1029_3-5443154.html

and here:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/041109/sftu090_1.html


Regards,

Jeremiah Grossman



On Monday, November 15, 2004, at 07:34  PM, The OWASP Project 
wrote:

An Open Letter (and Challenge) to the Application Security 
Consortium

Since its inception in late 2000 the Open Web Application 
Security  
Project (OWASP) has provided free and open tools and 
documentation to 

educate people about the increasing threat of insecure web  
applications and web services. As a not-for-profit charitable  
foundation, one of our community responsibilities is to ensure 
that  
fair and balanced information is available to companies and 
consumers. 

Our work has become recommended reading by the Federal Trade  
Commission, VISA, the Defense Information Systems Agency and many 
 
other commercial and government entities.

The newly unveiled Application Security Consortium recently 
announced 

a "Web Application Security Challenge" to other vendors at the  
Computer Security Institute (CSI) show in Washington, D.C. This 
group 

of security product vendors proposes to create a new minimum 
criteria 

and then rate their own products against it.

The OWASP community is deeply concerned that this criteria will  
mislead consumers and result in a false sense of security. In the 
 
interest of fairness, we believe the Application Security 
Consortium  
should disclose what security issues their products do not 
address.

As a group with a wide range of international members from 
leading  
financial services organizations, pharmaceutical companies,  
manufacturing companies, services providers, and technology 
vendors,  
we are constantly reminded about the diverse range of 
vulnerabilities 

that are present in web applications and web services. The very 
small 

selection of vulnerabilities you are proposing to become a 
testing  
criteria are far from representative of what our members see in 
the  
real world and therefore do not represent a fair or suitable test 
 
criteria. In fact, it seems quite a coincidence that the issues 
you  
have chosen seem to closely mirror the issues that your 
technology  
category is typically able to detect, while ignoring very common  

vulnerabilities that cause serious problems for companies.

Robert Graham, Chief Scientist at Internet Security Systems, 
recently 

commented on application firewalls in an interview for CNET news. 
When 

asked the question "How important do you think application 
firewalls  
will become in the future?" his answer was "Not very."


"Let me give you an example of something that happened with me. 
Not  
long ago, I ordered a plasma screen online, which was to be 
shipped by 

a local company in Atlanta. And the company gave me a six-digit  
shipping number. Accidentally, I typed in an incremental of my  
shipping number (on the online tracking Web site). Now, a six-
digit  
number is a small number, so of course I got someone else's user  

account information. And the reason that happened was due to the 
way  
they've set up their user IDs, by incrementing from a six-digit  
number. So here's the irony: Their system may be so 
cryptographically 

secure that (the) chances of an encrypted shipping number being  
cracked is lower than a meteor hitting the earth and wiping out  
civilization. Still, I could get at the next ID easily. There is 
no  
application firewall that can solve this problem. With 
applications  
that people are running on the Web, no amount of additive things 
can  
cure fundamental problems that are already there in the first 
place."

This story echoes some of the fundamental beliefs and wisdom 
shared by 

the collective members of OWASP. Our experience shows that the  
problems we face with insecure software cannot be fixed with  
technology alone. Building secure software requires deep changes 
in  
our development culture, including people, processes, and 
technology.

We challenge the members of the Application Security Consortium 
to  
accept a fair evaluation of their products. OWASP will work with 
its  
members (your customers) to create an open set of criteria that 
is  
representative of the web application and web services issues 
found in 

the real world. OWASP will then build a web application that 
contains 

each of these issues. The criteria and web application will be  
submitted to an independent testing company to evaluate your 
products. 

You can submit your products to be tested against the criteria  
(without having prior access to the code) on the basis that the  
results are able to be published freely and will unabridged.

We believe that this kind of marketing stunt is irresponsible and 
 
severely distracts awareness from the real issues surrounding web 
 
application and web services security. Corporations need to 
understand 

that they must build better software and not seek an elusive 
silver  
bullet.

We urge the Consortium not to go forward with their criteria, but 
to  
take OWASP up on our offer to produce a meaningful standard and 
test  
environment that are open and free for all.

Contact: owasp@owasp.org
Website: www.owasp.org





Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
secure FREE email: http://www.hushmail.com/?l=2

Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger
http://www.hushmail.com/services-messenger?l=434

Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program: 
http://www.hushmail.com/about-affiliate?l=427

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>