Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Your Opinion |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:27:39 -0700 |
<sarcasm with="dripping"> Yep - Windows Media Player put Real Media out of business while it single-handedly eliminated any media format other than WM, all right... ..and oh, yeh - IE completely squashed the remaining Mozilla-based development efforts. Wait - does anyone remember Unix-based OS's? Windows really wiped them off the face of the Earth, didn't it? </sarcasm> Monoculture or not (silly argument for a single-OS company, wouldn't you say?), if you base your business model on someone else's and they change their model to your detriment, do you blame them, try to partner with them or (gasp) adjust your model to the changing landscape? Oh, wait - because it's Microsoft, the rules are fluid. If MS intentionally limits product features to provide for ISV opportunities (yes, this does happen quite often), they're intentionally restricting user capabilities. OTOH, if MS tries to license or purchase technology or the company that owns it, it's guilty of "monopolism". OTTH, if MS attempts to "reinvent a competitive wheel", it's abusing its monopoly to wipe out the competition. Make up (discover?) your collective mind, willya? The fact of the matter is this - Windows users have made their collective desires clear - "give me protection from myself". Since this product noise is being directed to MS, it makes one wonder if the "competition" is all that worthy. Speaking of those who got rich, any company that opted to license or sell to MS haven't done all that badly, and there were no "Guidos" sent in to force their decisions, either. John-boy is whining - nothing more. -----Original Message----- From: casper@holland.sun.com [mailto:casper@holland.sun.com] On Behalf Of Casper.Dik@Sun.COM Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 3:20 PM To: Mark Litchfield Cc: bugtraq@securityfocus.com; vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org; full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Subject: Re: Your Opinion
I have heard the comment "It's a huge conflict of interest" for one
company
to provide both an operating platform and a security platform" made by
John
Thompson (CEO Symantec) many times from many different people. See
article
below.
"There goes our business model.", said John Thompson. The Microsoft mono culture has distinct advantages and has made quite a few people rich. But in the end, if Micrsoft does not buy your business but feels it needs to provide a product like your, you're toast. (At least, that part of your business is) Casper All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Your Opinion, Paul Stepowski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Your Opinion, Jim Harrison |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Your Opinion, Casper . Dik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Your Opinion, Forrest J. Cavalier III |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |