Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security VulnWatch
[Top] [All Lists]

[VulnWatch] [ TZO-012006 ] Checkpoint VPN-1 SecureClient insecure usage

Subject: [VulnWatch] [ TZO-012006 ] Checkpoint VPN-1 SecureClient insecure usage of CreateProcess()
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:48:47 +0100
Dear List,

Title  : CheckPoint - CheckQuotes!
Ref    : TZO-012006-Checkpoint
Author : Thierry Zoller
TXT    : http://secdev.zoller.lu/research/checkpoint.txt
URL    : http://secdev.zoller.lu/research/checkpoint.htm


Introduction :
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As employees become more mobile, sophisticated VPN solutions are
required to meet key security challenges such as securing access
to corporate resources and protecting remote desktops. To meet the
VPN client needs of any organization, Check Point offers VPN-1
SecureClient.

Details :
~~~~~~~~~
During Startup, the SR_Watchdog.exe spawns the GUI process (SR_GUI.exe)
through the use of the CreateProcess() function. By doing so it omits
to set the 'lpApplicationName' variable and further omits to quote the
path in the variable "lpCommandLine". Ref [1]

This results in c:\program.bat|exe|com being called prior to Sr_GUI.exe
and allows automatic startup of a potentially rogue application. In
particular one could imagine a scenario where it is possible to escalate
rights using this (as they are inherited from SR_Watchdog.exe).

I decided that this is not worth to report to the vendor, I consider this
low impact in terms of Security. (Although it might show bad coding
practice).

References :
~~~~~~~~~~~~
[1] http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-November/038789.html
[2] Only an issue on Win2k were a restricted user is allowed to write to c:\


-- 
http://secdev.zoller.lu
Thierry Zoller
Fingerprint : 5D84 BFDC CD36 A951 2C45  2E57 28B3 75DD 0AC6 F1C7

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [VulnWatch] [ TZO-012006 ] Checkpoint VPN-1 SecureClient insecure usage of CreateProcess(), Thierry Zoller <=