Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [Full-Disclosure] [SECUNIA] Regarding Secunia Advisory SA13040 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:47:30 +0100 |
Hi Xavier, The information in Secunia Advisory SA13040 is based on your own Changelog at Sourceforge. SA13040: http://secunia.com/SA13040 On 30th November you wrote to Secunia that this only affected the 1.4 branch. One hour later Secunia updated the advisory to reflect this and you received an answer with a confirmation that we had updated the advisory. If you spotted any other omissions back then, you could have contacted us again - obviously you didn't. Additionally, any information listed in product changelogs is considered public knowledge. Naturally, we don't contact vendors before issuing advisories based on information in their own changelogs / release notes. Also, we are not going to remove this advisory, as it is based on your own information. However, if you have any relevant additional information, we will naturally review them and update the advisory accordingly. Kind regards, Thomas Kristensen On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 14:08, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
Hello there,
As a maintainer of Caudium Webserver I wishes the following things
1- Secunia didn't contact us about this "advisory" you have
certainly googled the bugtracker on sourceforge and make this
advisory without contacting us before, so this is NOT the rules
about security advisory.
2- The Advisory it partialy false. You write that it affects Caudium
1.x branch. Since there is only one branch about Caudium this is
really disinformation about our software.
3- Secunia DIDN'T contact us (if you look at the source there is
mailing lists, emails and whatever things to help third party
people to contact us.
4- The "advisory" (and even the lasted change logs) say all version
of Caudium which is false, the ONLY VERSION that have the
bug (because IT IS a bug) is 1.4RC1 not 1.4RC2 or even 1.0.xx /
1.2.xx branch.
5- You didn't TEST by yourself before releasing this advisory, I can
consider that as half-done work...
Because of that. I ask Secunia.com to REMOVE this advisory because all
its contents is false and inaccurate. I really hope that all
of other work of Secunia.com is better than the extract I just saw...
Sincerly Xavier
--
Xavier Beaudouin - Unix System Administrator & Projects Leader.
President of Kazar Organization : http://www.kazar.net/
Please visit http://caudium.net/, home of Caudium & Camas projects
-- Kind regards, Thomas Kristensen CTO Secunia Toldbodgade 37B 1253 Copenhagen K Denmark Tlf.: +45 7020 5144 Fax: +45 7020 5145 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [VulnWatch] iDEFENSE Security Advisory 12.21.04: libtiff STRIPOFFSETS Integer Overflow Vulnerability, customer service mailbox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Full-Disclosure] Regarding Secunia Advisory SA13040., Xavier Beaudouin |
| Previous by Thread: | [Full-Disclosure] Regarding Secunia Advisory SA13040., Xavier Beaudouin |
| Next by Thread: | [Full-Disclosure] Re: [caudium-devel] [SECUNIA] Regarding Secunia Advisory SA13040, Marek Habersack |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |