I may not have a clue but when I read the email from the author of this "POC"
it stated that it was a poc to show where the overflow will occur and doesn't
actually exploit the vulnerability. Furthermore the vulnerability is a heap
based overflow which means that successful worm like exploitation isn't really
the highest possibility as you suggest in your fear based email.
Simply,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: admin@exploitwatch.org <admin@exploitwatch.org>
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>;
bugtraq@securityfocus.com <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>; vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org
<vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org>
Sent: Fri Sep 17 03:50:01 2004
Subject: [exploitwatch.org] ALERT: Windows XP JPEG Buffer Overflow POCExploit
A PoC for the Windows XP JPEG has been published. Because of the potential
impact, it is anticipated that this exploit will be widely used by worms and
other malware within a short period of time.
http://www.gulftech.org/?node=downloads
Regards,
admin@exploitwatch.org
http://exploitwatch.org
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail communication and any attachments may
contain
confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated
recipients named above. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have
received this
communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination,
distribution or
copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this
communication in
error, please notify me immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your
computer. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
