Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Vuln-Dev
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Cryptome: NSA has real-time access to Hushmail servers

Subject: RE: Cryptome: NSA has real-time access to Hushmail servers
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:18:57 -0800
One would be required not to disclose the fact that you were served a
letter or what records you were "asked" to disclose.  Apparently, the
language of the letter is worded to make one think that cooperation is
legally required, though it looks like it is voluntary.  And even
"required" is dubious... According to the ACLU, the "gag order" portion
of the NSL provision of the Patriot Act was found to be unconstitutional
on two occasions.  

But no, you couldn't be legally required to "lie."  Had Guardster
received such a letter, and they decided to comply, they would most
likely have not responded at all rather than make a public statement to
the contrary...

t

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Shockley [mailto:steve.shockley@shockley.net]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:11 AM
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Cryptome: NSA has real-time access to Hushmail servers

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
Note that if they had been served with an NSL (National Security
Letter),
they may be legally *required* to lie about it while cooperating.
Actually
truthfully saying "Yeah, an NSL showed up and we complied" could
land
them
in jail....

Requred to lie, or just required to not disclose the cooperation?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>