Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: "run as" local denial-of-service enables administrative account processes to be killed |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:30:18 -0400 |
Eitan Caspi wrote Saturday, June 23, 2007 4:45 PM
Summary: While a user, at any security membership level, is logged in locally, using the "run as" feature, it can kill all of the processes running under the user who initiated the "run as" feature, even if the initiating user has a security membership level higher than the user initiating the killing action under "run as". The kill is performed using the taskkill.exe application which is built into Windows XP.
It's true Microsoft does not display a unified front on such security issues, and they sometimes have conflicting advice on their site. But Runas is more useful for escalating privilege than for downgrading it. Anything running on your interactive desktop can interact with anything else running on it, regardless of the security context that started each app. So privilege-lowering conveniences like Runas or even desktop VMs are absolutely subject to the possibility of cross-context interaction. There are security context checks built into many functions, and you did find one that does not have things as locked down as they should be, but these locks and checks are vector-specific and do not address the basic exploit potential directly. I don't see a lot of exploits of this potential, but it is designed into Windows and needs to be there for you to be able to interact with the apps yourself. So running an interactive sandbox on a trusted system will inherently increase your risks. See KB327618 for more info. - Jim
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: KF Web Server 3.1.0 admin console XSS, support |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | MITKRB5-SA-2007-004: kadmind multiple RPC lib vulnerabilities, Tom Yu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] "run as" local denial-of-service enables administrative account processes to be killed, KJK::Hyperion |
| Next by Thread: | [Full-disclosure] Safari XMLHttpRequest HTTP header injection, Richard Moore |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |