Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:19:52 +0100 |
Hi, Solaris is now Open Source, so you can see yourself at http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/diff/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/cmd/cmd-in et/usr.sbin/in.telnetd.c?r2=3629&r1=2923 what the problem and its resolution are. There are also the blogs by Alan Hargreaves from SUN Australia at http://blogs.sun.com/tpenta/entry/the_in_telnetd_vulnerability_exploit and by Dan McDonald from SUN at http://blogs.sun.com/danmcd/entry/how_opensolaris_did_its_job describing how this vulnerability was first reported, fixed and alerts and patches provided. This is a big mistake but I see no reason to think of backdoors and age-old problems on other OSes any longer. On the contrary I can see the huge progress SUN has made and is making in regards to security and openness. Cheers Georg Oppenberg
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Oliver Friedrichs wrote:Am I missing something? This vulnerability is close to 10 years old. It was in one of the first versions of Solaris after Sun moved off of the SunOS BSD platform and over to SysV. It has specifically to do with how arguments are processed via getopt() if I recall correctly.Hey Oliver! :) Well than, I guess it just became new again. And to be honest, I have to agree with a previous poster and suspect (only suspect) it could somehow be a backdoor rather than a bug. The reason why this vulnerability is so critical is the number of networks and organizations which rely on Solaris for critical production servers, as well as use telnet for internal communication on their LAN (now how smart is that? I'd rather use telnet on the Internet than on a local LAN). Further, there are quite a few third party appliances (some infrastructure back-end) that can not easily be patched running on Solaris (forget fuzzing or VA, people never even NMAP appliances they
buy).
I am unsure of how long we will see this in to-do items of corporate security teams around the world, but I am sure Sun's /8 is getting a lot of action recently.OliverGadi.
| Previous by Date: | Re: DotClear Full Path Disclosure Vulnerability, Gmail account |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Full-disclosure] [ GLSA 200702-02 ] ProFTPD: Local privilege escalation, Raphael Marichez |
| Previous by Thread: | Reflections on Trusting Trust [was: Re: Solaris telnet ...], Gadi Evron |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network?, Adrian Sanabria |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |