Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Multiple Vendor Anti-Virus Software DetectionEvasion Vulnerability through forged magic byte |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:32:42 +0545 |
Consequently, the issue that you describe is *not* a vulnerability issue, but rather just an example of a new variant that has not yet been added to an AV vendor's database of "known viruses".
yap, maybe* but i consider this issue equv. to the 'classic issue' of adding NOP to the shell-code to bypass IDS/IPS You ain't gonna add every possible combinations as signatures!
Instead of beahviour analysis, most AV vendors choose uterly stupid PE section fingerprints, defeated by adding a few bytes. Go figure. of course this is no vulnerability, it's a feature!
Is, CA eTrust Antivirus, run in Reviewer mode by default? (sorry, i haven't tryed ant Av lately) -------------
My theory on this is simple : - ALL files can't be analysed the same way by AV engines (due to speed issues) (In other words not all analysis/fingerpritns is applied to every file)
The solution was to make the engines a bit "smarter", i.e analyse the header to determine the type and then ONLY apply the signatures/heuristics which apply to the type of the file (i am not speaking about the extension of the file here) thus speeding up the process. Changing the header just makes the smart engines look...well... a bit dumb in my regards.
------
The AV vendors aren't going to patch their products if they don't detect your PoC; they're just going to write a new signature or modify an existing signature to detect your new variants. The fact that it can and will be fixed by AV signatures instead of product patches should help you figure out if this is a product vulnerability issue or just a "new virus variant" issue.
-------------
Variant huh?
My defination of variant are bit straight forward. And sure isn't a
'universal trick' that can be used to modified any malicious
executable (which has known Av signature) by a 8 year old with 0
programming knowledge or by using any special tools to make it
un-detectable, later. Admit it... Av vendors aren't going to
doyuble/tripple their Av defination to detect all of such possible
varient.
Common, is the execution point of ANY instruction code or program flow
is being changed?
There are two types of people in the world: those who complain about problems, and those who find solutions to problems. Where's your superior AV scanner?
Lastly, yap I also feel there are 2 type of ppl. in the world. One who gives answers to a question and the other who askz another another question AS the answer of the previous question. -best regards, Bipin Gautam Zeroth law of security: The possibility of poking a system from lower privilege is zero unless & until there is possibility of direct, indirect or consequential communication between the two...
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Full-disclosure] [ GLSA 200510-24 ] Mantis: Multiple vulnerabilities, Thierry Carrez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [ GLSA 200510-23 ] TikiWiki: XSS vulnerability, Thierry Carrez |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Multiple Vendor Anti-Virus Software DetectionEvasion Vulnerability through forged magic byte, Andrey Bayora |
| Next by Thread: | Network Appliance iSCSI Authentication Bypass, advisories |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |