Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Vuln-Dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Security Flaw with Digital signatures in Microsoft Outlook

Subject: Re: Security Flaw with Digital signatures in Microsoft Outlook
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:20:27 +0100
Roberto writes:

This 3rd email is yet another variation showing how a digitally
signed email can further be forget without Outlook ever raising
warning flags (follow the hyperlinks for the email's source):

Digitally-signed messages cannot be forged.  However, only the body of a
digitally-signed message is actually included in the text covered by the
signature; the headers are excluded.  That's not an Outlook
idiosyncrasy, it's just the way signed e-mail works.

In every screenshot you provide, Outlook correctly identifies the party
that created the digital signature.  That's what a security-conscious
user will check.  And the text of the message has not been changed, so
the signature is still valid, and no forgery has occurred.

I'm afraid I don't see any problem here.  Yes, it's inconvenient that
one can forge the "From" line of a message, but in secure e-mail, one
doesn't rely on the "From" line, anyway, precisely because it can be so
easily forged.  I suppose it might be nice if Outlook made the
discrepancy between the "From" line and the signer's authenticated
identity a bit more obvious, but that's not a security breach, just an
ergonomic issue.

--
Anthony


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>