Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:51:38 +0100 |
I can see that that would be useful but it would fail to comply with
the POSIX standard, which specifies:
The find utility shall be able to descend to arbitrary
depths in a file hierarchy and shall not fail due to path
length limitations (unless a path operand specified by the
application exceeds {PATH_MAX} requirements)
But PATH_MAX is limited and the number of file descriptors is perhaps not. (On Solaris, PATH_MAX is 1024 so you require at most 512 file descriptors to keep the stack of directories: 512 is less than the default hard limit of 65536 file descriptors per process [S9, S8 and before used 1024, still >> 512) Casper
| Previous by Date: | STG Security Advisory: [SSA-20041122-11] JSPWiki XSS vulnerability, advisory |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Router ZyXEL Prestige 650 HW http remote admin., Steve Clement |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?, devnull |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Changes to the filesystem while find is running - comments?, Martin Buchholz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |