Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Allows Authenticated Users to Modify Votes

> On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 13:16, Nicholas Knight wrote:
> > Unrealistic? It is a *voting system*! It does exactly *one* *very*
> > *simple* thing! If it cannot do it bug-free, its developers are
> > incompetent and should not be allowed anywhere near a compiler, much 
> > less the key to democracy.
>
> Thank you. This is the most rational post I've seen. 
>
> if(VoteForBush) { bush++; }
> elseif(VoteForKerry) { kerry++; }
> elseif(VoteForNader) { nader++; }
>
> Is not tough. Diebold's refusal to allow the world to see that is highly
> suspicious. I suppose I'll get sued under the DMCA for posting their
> intellectual property now... Or maybe I have to change line 2 to:
> elseif(VoteForKerry) { bush++; } first... There, let the lawsuits rain

You are underestimating the compexity of the system.

Surely a touch screen is involved or some other device and
an operating systems.

Surely it's just a minor matter of programming of either the

        touchscreen
        window system
        OS

to recognize a voting screen and redirect the input
events to different buttons.

A touch screen can do this by sending wrong coordinates
and then fake output.

A window system can do this by sending the even to the
wrong button and doing some I/O substitution.

All a minor matter of programming.

And as other have said; as an ordinary voter you have to
trust people who verified the voting system unless you
get a paper copy of your ballot which you can put in the backup
bin.

Casper