Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Vuln-Dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Al

Subject: Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Allows Authenticated Users to Modify Votes
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:38:56 -0700
"Greg A. Woods" writes:

The answer is not to try to show that open source can be used in
captialistic ventures, but rather to be very clear in stating that free
enterprise (and capitalism) has no place whatsoever at any time in the
creation, formation, and instatement of a government for the people.

Do expect to return to the age where voting is done with a pen and a
blank slip of paper, both supplied by the voter?   If not then free
enterprise will be involved.   Or do you also expect your local
government to grow the raw materials to make make the paper, ink,
printing machines, etc., used in even the simplest of elections.

I don't even expect local governments to print ballots if it can be
done cheaper by private enterprise.  After all, it's my money being saved.

All I demand from a voting system is that votes can be voter verified.
That's not true of ANY voting machine regardless of who writes the code
unless there is a hard copy audit trail.   If there is a hard copy audit
trail then it doesn't make any difference who wrote the code.

// marc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>