Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] Performance Question (output) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:48:28 -0400 |
Whether the database is on the same machine as the sniffing interface or not, you always want to use the unified output plugin, and have barnyard insert the data into the database, especially when performance concern. . -Seth On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Stewart L <stewartl42@gmail.com> wrote:
So, I'm a little confused with output... For performance (sniffing Gig networks) would I be better off using the database output module and writing directly to the database? Or should I be doing unified logging and importing that to the database with barnyard? I'm guessing writing directly to the database would be faster for remote sensors, but I've been wrong before. :) Would the same apply if the database was on the same machine as the sniffing interface? FYI, I'm planning on having one central database server that will also have at least one sniffing interface (possibly up to three) and 3-4 remote network sensors. the Central box is Beefy (Four multi-core processors, 16GB of Ram and 1.2TB of disk). -- Stewart -- You only lose what you cling to. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-users] compilation trouble, Marco Chirico |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] Detecting Packed Executables?, Tommy Cansanay |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] Performance Question (output), Stewart L |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] compilation trouble, Marco Chirico |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |