Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] Strange portscan traffic with dest of 169.254.x.x |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:02:04 -0500 |
CunningPike had it right. When your machines can't find an IP (via DHCP, or whatever), they default to the 169.254.x.x range. Since your machines were contacting ports 139:445, I am willing to bet that it's a Windows machine plugged into the network somewhere, (on the same broadcast domain as your Snort sensor), and can't DHCP itself for whatever reason. My suggest is that you use Snort in sniffer mode like #snort -vde 'net 169.254.x.x' look at the mac addresses. See if that helps you out any. Assigning these IPs should be the default behavior of both Windows and OSX. Joel On Feb 25, 2008, at 5:47 PM, dhottinger@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote:
Quoting Aaron Giuoco <agiuoco@yahoo.com>:True. But it is unusual to see so much traffic from 169.254 leaving a computer that already has a network connection. I haven't been able to confirm whether the packets are related to ActiveSync like Paul mentioned. Thanks for the replies. I'll try to confirm whether or not ActiveSync is being used on these PCs or not and post back. AGI missed part of this post. However, I see lots of 169 traffic from my apple 10.4, 10.5 computers. I think they use it for bonjour or entourage, which is a way to find printers, and other network resources. -- Dwayne Hottinger Network Administrator Harrisonburg City Public Schools "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
-- Joel Esler ï joel.esler@sourcefire.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] Strange portscan traffic with dest of 169.254.x.x, dhottinger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] SQL to purge alerts over 1 month old?, Terry Burton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Strange portscan traffic with dest of 169.254.x.x, dhottinger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] Strange portscan traffic with dest of 169.254.x.x, Aaron Giuoco |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |