Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] snort and squid |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:18:46 -0500 |
Helmut,
Did you also add 3128 to the http_inspect preprocessor? ie:
http_inspect_server: server default profile all ports {80 3128}
-Seth
On Jan 18, 2008 10:14 AM, Helmut Schneider <jumper99@gmx.de> wrote:
Of course Snort will inspect the traffic. However, to view the internal ip, if the proxy is rewriting the Source IP, then it's a limitation. If your intention is other, please clarify. I'm afraid I am not sure I understand what you are asking then.It shouldn't matter if I inspect traffic from the proxy to the webserver or from the client to the proxy, the content should be the same. But - I put snort on the proxy and changed HTTP_PORTS to 3128. I use the same snort.conf for the external sensor and for the sensor on the proxy. Now, what happens is, that I hit certain rules (e.g. SHELLCODE x86 NOOP, Invalid FTP Command, and some more, so the sensor itself is working fine) but I do not hit the porn or policy rules. I can wireshark the traffic from the client to the proxy, I see the words 'porn' or 'masturbate' or whatever in cleartext but snort does not hit some rules at all. At the same time the rules for porn or policy *are* hit on the external sensor. So now I wonder why the external sensor hits the rules while the sensor on the proxy does not. Althought I use exactly the same snort.conf except of HTTP_PORTS. Hope that clarifies. :) Helmut ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] snort and squid, Helmut Schneider |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] snort and squid, Helmut Schneider |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] snort and squid, Helmut Schneider |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] snort and squid, Helmut Schneider |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |