Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] [ASK] Silent Interface?? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:20:56 -0800 (PST) |
Ok.. Network taps and port mirroring.. I think I understand how the port mirroring works, but, for network tap, how can I do this technically? um..the cable that used for tapping, is it connecting the sensor interface with port on the switch? or what? In this case, I has already configured the sensor to communicate with active response agent locate in the firewall. So I need to assign an IP address to the interface connected to gateway (also operate as firewall). I use TSL (Trustix Secure Linux) as a sensor, firewall, and servers. How can I make the sensor interface unassigns (without IP assigned), AFAIK, the other choices if we didn't statically assign the IP address is DHCP. How about this? ----- Original Message ---- From: JJC <cummingsj@gmail.com> To: snort <Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 10:09:12 PM Subject: Re: [Snort-users] [ASK] Silent Interface?? A second option would be to use port mirroring (or in the Cisco world "SPAN"), this assumes that your switches support this feature. In either the tap or port mirror scenario, the listening interface(s) do not need DHCP or an IP address configured. It is, in fact, generally recommended that you not have an address assigned to the interface that will be sniffing the traffic. That said, you typically will have two or more interfaces on your snort box, one for doing the sniffing (this one without an ip and connected to the mirrored port) and the other for management of the system itself and connected to your internal network . Cheers, JJC http://global-security.blogspot.com On Dec 19, 2007 8:20 AM, Gould, Scott < scott.gould@gogstats.org> wrote: Mat, You can place network taps between the gateway and switch in your diagram. These taps have a monitor port that will connect to the sensor, and in turn send a copy of all the traffic seen by the tap to the sensor. Scott Gould Senior Network & Systems Analyst Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical & Data Center scott dot gould at gogstats dot org From: snort-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:snort-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Rachmat Hidayat Al-Anshar Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:10 PM To: snort Subject: [Snort-users] [ASK] Silent Interface?? Hi guys... Straightforward, I just wanna know deeper about "silent interface" that we might use on sensors. I have a topology like this: y INTERNET ---- gateway ----- sensor | | x | | +-------- switch --------- gateway ------- INTRANET | | ------------- | | | (servers on DMZ) is it true that we can use the sensor interface silently monitoring the traffic flowing accross the switch ? (marked with x)?? if the answers is correct, then how can i do that?? is it with use the dhcp on in? or what?? Thanks in advance Any response will greatly appreciated Mat (^^) Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] help with rules - data capturing, Timothy Ding |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Snort-users] help with rules - data capturing, Joel Esler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] [ASK] Silent Interface??, JJC |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Snort-users] [ASK] Silent Interface??, Joel Esler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |