Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] [snort-users] uricontent |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:46:39 -0500 |
It could be many things at this point. Can you provide a pcap, the snort.conf in use (with the rules in question), and the output of snort -V Cheers, Keith pierz wrote:
Ok you probably didn't understood my crappy english. The input/parameter/whatever of name 'check' with the value 'pierz' is not a part of the uri. This packet doesn't have to alert. Another example, look at this two rulz : alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HTTP_SERVERS $HTTP_PORTS (msg:".php in uri"; flow:established,to_server; uricontent:".php"; nocase; sid:123; ) alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HTTP_SERVERS $HTTP_PORTS (msg:".php and http in uri"; flow:established,to_server; uricontent:".php"; nocase; uricontent:"http"; nocase; sid:456; ) Now, look at the following packets, they are only detected by the 1st rulz : [PACKET1] POST / HTTP/1.1 Host: 192.168.1.2 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded postinput=.php [/PACKET1] [PACKET2] GET /somefile.php HTTP/1.1 Host: 192.168.1.2 [/PACKET2] [PACKET3] POST /somefile.php HTTP/1.1 Host: 192.168.1.2 Content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded backdoor=http [/PACKET3] Ok, i think PACKET1 should not be detected regarding the snort rulz, cause postinput=.php is not a part of the uri. Now if the PACKET1 match the first rulz, i don't understand why PACKET3 don't match the second rulz ! I'm using the lastest version of snort. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-users] [snort-users] uricontent, pierz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] myRules - Free Snort Rules Package Management, Aanval dot Com |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] [snort-users] uricontent, pierz |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] myRules - Free Snort Rules Package Management, Aanval dot Com |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |