Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Snort-users] Excluding a single host from a rule |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:46:58 -0600 |
Event suppressions is what your looking for. Something like: suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 123456, track by_src, ip 10.10.10.10 or for your entire network cidr by src suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 123456, track by_src, ip 10.10.10.0/24 Here is a link to the snort doc's on the subject: http://www.snort.org/docs/snort_htmanuals/htmanual_280/node339.html --jeremy On Nov 15, 2007 5:09 AM, Roman Daszczyszak <romandas@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all, I'm relatively new to using Snort, yet I've read through the rules section in the manual and tried searching the Sourcefire forums and can't seem to find an answer to this. How can I exclude a single host on my network from an alert rule? Specifically, I have a fileserver that hosts Windows shares for our users' home directory and profiles. The users connect from all across our enterprise and when they do, Windows XP seems to handle the transaction first by pinging the fileserver, then establishing the connection via TCP/NetBIOS. However, with the quantity of users, each of those ICMP pings prior to the real connection are collectively causing the ICMP NMAP rule to fire. I would like to exclude the fileserver from alerting when the NMAP rule fires, yet keep the rule active for the rest of the network. How can I do this? Thanks, Roman ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users@lists.sourceforge.net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Snort-users] Excluding a single host from a rule, Roman Daszczyszak |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Snort-users] Double Decoding Attack bad?, The New York NOC Inc. |
| Previous by Thread: | [Snort-users] Excluding a single host from a rule, Roman Daszczyszak |
| Next by Thread: | [Snort-users] Double Decoding Attack bad?, The New York NOC Inc. |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |